Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #9664

Re: None versus MISSING sentinel -- request for design feedback

Path csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder3.hal-mli.net!feeder.news-service.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <ethan@stoneleaf.us>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.008
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 0.98; '*S*': 0.00; 'python': 0.08; 'from:addr:ethan': 0.09; 'from:addr:stoneleaf.us': 0.09; 'from:name:ethan furman': 0.09; 'message-id:@stoneleaf.us': 0.09; 'none)': 0.09; 'none.': 0.09; 'received:gator410.hostgator.com': 0.09; 'subject:None': 0.09; '~ethan~': 0.09; 'thorough': 0.13; 'wrote:': 0.15; '(null,': 0.16; 'okay,': 0.16; 'subject:design': 0.16; 'subject:versus': 0.16; '(which': 0.20; "doesn't": 0.22; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.22; 'gregory': 0.23; 'null': 0.23; 'subject: -- ': 0.25; 'character': 0.28; 'replaced': 0.29; 'times.': 0.30; 'ewing': 0.30; 'practices.': 0.30; 'compare': 0.31; 'values': 0.31; 'seem': 0.31; 'rather': 0.33; "i've": 0.33; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.34; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.34; 'there': 0.34; 'however,': 0.34; 'things': 0.34; 'none': 0.35; 'project': 0.35; 'thank': 0.35; 'probably': 0.35; 'question': 0.35; 'equal': 0.35; 'supposed': 0.35; 'idea': 0.36; 'comparing': 0.37; 'date,': 0.37; 'some': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'something': 0.38; 'think': 0.38; 'common': 0.39; 'case': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'dedicated': 0.62; 'back': 0.63; 'received:websitewelcome.com': 0.65; 'believe': 0.66; 'received:184': 0.67; 'received:69.93': 0.67; 'special': 0.67; 'learned': 0.73; 'question!': 0.84; 'received:69.93.164': 0.91
Date Sat, 16 Jul 2011 17:31:06 -0700
From Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us>
User-Agent Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228)
MIME-Version 1.0
To python-list@python.org
Subject Re: None versus MISSING sentinel -- request for design feedback
References <4e1fd009$0$29986$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <mailman.1044.1310710125.1164.python-list@python.org> <4e201a9d$0$29989$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <mailman.1060.1310727853.1164.python-list@python.org> <4e203706$0$29972$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <ivpeip$l9$1@speranza.aioe.org> <mailman.1071.1310749444.1164.python-list@python.org> <98cb2oF3vpU1@mid.individual.net>
In-Reply-To <98cb2oF3vpU1@mid.individual.net>
Content-Type text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-AntiAbuse This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse Primary Hostname - gator410.hostgator.com
X-AntiAbuse Original Domain - python.org
X-AntiAbuse Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse Sender Address Domain - stoneleaf.us
X-BWhitelist no
X-Source
X-Source-Args
X-Source-Dir
X-Source-Sender c-67-170-168-84.hsd1.or.comcast.net ([192.168.74.5]) [67.170.168.84]:2258
X-Source-Auth ethan+stoneleaf.us
X-Email-Count 1
X-Source-Cap dG9idWs7dG9idWs7Z2F0b3I0MTAuaG9zdGdhdG9yLmNvbQ==
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.12
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.1146.1310862722.1164.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 27
NNTP-Posting-Host 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace 1310862722 news.xs4all.nl 23956 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:50809
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:9664

Show key headers only | View raw


Gregory Ewing wrote:
> Ethan Furman wrote:
>> some of the return values (Logical, Date, DateTime, and probably 
>> Character) will have their own dedicated singletons (Null, NullDate, 
>> NullDateTime, NullChar -- which will all compare equal to None)
> 
> That doesn't seem like a good idea to me. It's common practice
> to use 'is' rather than '==' when comparing things to None.
> 
> Why do you want to use special null values for these types?

Okay, after spending some time thinking about this question
I don't believe I have a good answer.  I think it was probably something 
I thought of back when I started this project (which is basically what I 
learned Python on) and I've since learned enough that whatever reason I 
had back then has been replaced with more thorough knowledge and better 
practices.

The best reason I have at this point is being able to know what the Null 
value is supposed to represent -- True/False, a Date, etc. -- however, 
even that is weakened by my decision to use None for Null in the case of 
Character and Numerics; so there is probably no reason to not use None 
in the case of Logicals, Dates, DateTimes, and Times.

Thank you for the question!

~Ethan~

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

None versus MISSING sentinel -- request for design feedback Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-07-15 15:28 +1000
  Re: None versus MISSING sentinel -- request for design feedback Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-07-15 16:08 +1000
    Re: None versus MISSING sentinel -- request for design feedback "bruno.desthuilliers@gmail.com" <bruno.desthuilliers@gmail.com> - 2011-07-15 00:53 -0700
    Re: None versus MISSING sentinel -- request for design feedback Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-07-15 20:46 +1000
      Re: None versus MISSING sentinel -- request for design feedback Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-07-15 21:04 +1000
        Re: None versus MISSING sentinel -- request for design feedback Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-07-15 22:48 +1000
          Re: None versus MISSING sentinel -- request for design feedback Mel <mwilson@the-wire.com> - 2011-07-15 09:16 -0400
            Re: None versus MISSING sentinel -- request for design feedback Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2011-07-15 10:18 -0700
              Re: None versus MISSING sentinel -- request for design feedback Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2011-07-16 14:24 +1200
                Re: None versus MISSING sentinel -- request for design feedback Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2011-07-16 17:31 -0700
  Re: None versus MISSING sentinel -- request for design feedback Rob Williscroft <rtw@rtw.me.uk> - 2011-07-15 07:43 +0000
    Re: None versus MISSING sentinel -- request for design feedback Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-07-15 20:19 +1000
      Re: None versus MISSING sentinel -- request for design feedback "OKB (not okblacke)" <brenNOSPAMbarn@NObrenSPAMbarn.net> - 2011-07-15 17:40 +0000
      Re: None versus MISSING sentinel -- request for design feedback Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2011-07-15 17:35 -0400
  Re: None versus MISSING sentinel -- request for design feedback Cameron Simpson <cs@zip.com.au> - 2011-07-15 17:44 +1000
    Re: None versus MISSING sentinel -- request for design feedback "bruno.desthuilliers@gmail.com" <bruno.desthuilliers@gmail.com> - 2011-07-15 02:58 -0700
    Re: None versus MISSING sentinel -- request for design feedback Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-07-15 20:17 +1000
      Re: None versus MISSING sentinel -- request for design feedback Cameron Simpson <cs@zip.com.au> - 2011-07-15 20:38 +1000
  Re: None versus MISSING sentinel -- request for design feedback "bruno.desthuilliers@gmail.com" <bruno.desthuilliers@gmail.com> - 2011-07-15 00:59 -0700
  Re: None versus MISSING sentinel -- request for design feedback Teemu Likonen <tlikonen@iki.fi> - 2011-07-15 11:28 +0300
    Re: None versus MISSING sentinel -- request for design feedback "bruno.desthuilliers@gmail.com" <bruno.desthuilliers@gmail.com> - 2011-07-15 03:02 -0700
      Re: None versus MISSING sentinel -- request for design feedback Teemu Likonen <tlikonen@iki.fi> - 2011-07-15 13:56 +0300
  Re: None versus MISSING sentinel -- request for design feedback Eric Snow <ericsnowcurrently@gmail.com> - 2011-07-15 11:02 -0600

csiph-web