Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #102284
| Path | csiph.com!feeder.erje.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.kamp.net!newsfeed.kamp.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Subject | Re: Cannot step through asynchronous iterator manually |
| Date | Sat, 30 Jan 2016 01:02:29 -0700 |
| Lines | 20 |
| Message-ID | <mailman.114.1454140952.2338.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| References | <n8hjmt$b8n$1@ger.gmane.org> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=UTF-8 |
| X-Trace | news.uni-berlin.de 6xcptdVb4MHiqky8E7d25QgILvdrkdMLb8rh2fyTuzPw== |
| Return-Path | <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.013 |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 0.97; '*S*': 0.00; 'received:209.85.223': 0.03; 'higher-level': 0.09; 'loop.': 0.09; 'python': 0.10; 'jan': 0.11; '2016': 0.16; 'async': 0.16; 'iterator': 0.16; 'received:io': 0.16; 'received:psf.io': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; '>': 0.18; 'pass': 0.22; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.24; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.27; "skip:' 10": 0.28; 'usually': 0.33; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'expected': 0.35; 'step': 0.36; 'but': 0.36; 'received:209.85': 0.36; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.36; 'pm,': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'desired': 0.37; 'missing': 0.37; 'received:209': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'course.': 0.67; "'for'": 0.84; 'construct': 0.84; 'to:name:python': 0.84 |
| DKIM-Signature | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=/VFqoHMFeMyPJo8ZFCCP0P6plx1/xPrfGurw4jCLBlM=; b=V0TpjEhGsydXM2OzVh3l54EHZokR3O0p3xy2IpWON1/QsKmIXcCAzxSse6Kfn/qVfY JhlYyzm30//ct7lKBrsdDeLZc+QQfbwj1X+fNAV7KnZkP8uiSaf0hPvHCIbVwZma/D7m 50s5syeHUHijMdAjzsogJM6+4mmiSEXm0j6PdyqdsEc8d8D1/UWVWNZHR95z21coxl1v edlDixbqANTmyTye/Zpd+geeBNempucx/EJ2yGfyMXwoX+e/cuUF2qZb/tyvMZveS7eD t+iubZ0jn2qoUCGVObFJ0eckBxFXgHtXYvTeH/fq6MbUGP45Mabd2Enp5hoidnpgQCU+ O+XQ== |
| X-Google-DKIM-Signature | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=/VFqoHMFeMyPJo8ZFCCP0P6plx1/xPrfGurw4jCLBlM=; b=SMbBUW5WEV7pN9mNIqDfpCpfF6/pVbCL9jes4Vz27UQRxDe3ObnN9MwbZlIwQXLYu9 uGbUABWLy3chcFZkKBmJXKCZB5sXTC7/OUVNC27JVuwE1nTX8d9rcpPWoj1vd0EWlkR5 930B8CAI5l7yZ9zd2dH2TXq04iZnDkvyRUuj45rnLWni60+VY8ZJ1ZKt8ianXVzfHfAn 2ZcdrpkiEESckPVkttBYbfgfXkQ3Z4PD6gwtfMQSWvxtPzttwF2ieJYwH9ONof5bBk7b HantIDxFGDsgNJPBvy3sVa8YzS0lE9ZUqHpSQ/fWME07bOasZXEmqF0Kmmck2NiTMJao sXRg== |
| X-Gm-Message-State | AG10YORvSDwtvigSDMW6+vwbW/72snQCP3Htjmx2LLUPdwgzEZHQdZOwY03Y/cZgeCLm139UDLQVAw0MTUef/A== |
| X-Received | by 10.107.19.90 with SMTP id b87mr1797392ioj.11.1454140949750; Sat, 30 Jan 2016 00:02:29 -0800 (PST) |
| In-Reply-To | <n8hjmt$b8n$1@ger.gmane.org> |
| X-Content-Filtered-By | Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20+ |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.20+ |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.python:102284 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On Jan 29, 2016 11:04 PM, "Frank Millman" <frank@chagford.com> wrote:
>
> Hi all
>
> To loop though an iterator one usually uses a higher-level construct such
as a 'for' loop. However, if you want to step through it manually you can
do so with next(iter).
>
> I expected the same functionality with the new 'asynchronous iterator' in
Python 3.5, but I cannot find it.
>
> I can achieve the desired result by calling 'await aiter.__anext__()',
but this is clunky.
>
> Am I missing something?
async for x in aiter:
pass
Can only be used inside a coroutine, of course.
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Cannot step through asynchronous iterator manually Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 01:02 -0700
csiph-web