Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #73817
| Path | csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!dedibox.gegeweb.org!gegeweb.eu!nntpfeed.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Return-Path | <python-python-list@m.gmane.org> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.041 |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 0.92; '*S*': 0.00; 'sufficient': 0.05; 'over,': 0.07; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'bug': 0.12; 'competent': 0.16; 'finney': 0.16; 'imo,': 0.16; 'maintainers': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'url:catb': 0.16; 'url:~esr': 0.16; 'reports,': 0.19; 'not,': 0.20; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.23; 'library,': 0.24; 'skip': 0.24; "i've": 0.25; 'asking': 0.27; 'header:X-Complaints- To:1': 0.27; 'tried': 0.27; 'point': 0.28; 'have,': 0.30; '(which': 0.31; 'program,': 0.31; 'becoming': 0.31; 'writes:': 0.31; 'subject:the': 0.34; 'but': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'library.': 0.36; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'url:org': 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'effort': 0.37; 'project': 0.37; 'ben': 0.38; 'to:addr:python- list': 0.38; 'that,': 0.38; 'subject:" ': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:org': 0.40; 'even': 0.60; 'skip:u 10': 0.60; 'interest': 0.64; 'more': 0.64; 'skip:\xe2 10': 0.65; 'contact': 0.67; 'duty': 0.68; 'lose': 0.68; '8bit%:43': 0.74; 'hand': 0.80; 'abandon': 0.84; 'cathedral': 0.84; 'received:125': 0.84; 'subject:source': 0.84; '\xe2\x80\x9cthe': 0.91; 'yours.': 0.93 |
| X-Injected-Via-Gmane | http://gmane.org/ |
| To | python-list@python.org |
| From | Ben Finney <ben@benfinney.id.au> |
| Subject | Re: What's the "right" way to abandon an open source package? |
| Date | Wed, 02 Jul 2014 09:18:59 +1000 |
| References | <CANc-5UwWVRyQeN15pWSJbeGimPPF7YmBdp6mP-3c5GW7FyK8dQ@mail.gmail.com> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=utf-8 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 8bit |
| X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host | jigong.madmonks.org |
| X-Public-Key-ID | 0xAC128405 |
| X-Public-Key-Fingerprint | 517C F14B B2F3 98B0 CB35 4855 B8B2 4C06 AC12 8405 |
| X-Public-Key-URL | http://www.benfinney.id.au/contact/bfinney-pubkey.asc |
| X-Post-From | Ben Finney <bignose+hates-spam@benfinney.id.au> |
| User-Agent | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (gnu/linux) |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:7xVEhcPYcBw+IkL2K1rqf5pWV68= |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.15 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.11390.1404256759.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| Lines | 39 |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 2001:888:2000:d::a6 |
| X-Trace | 1404256759 news.xs4all.nl 2964 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:38804 |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@xs4all.nl |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.python:73817 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Skip Montanaro <skip@python.org> writes:
> I've tried to find people to take it over, but so far unsuccessfully.
The principle (laid out by ESR in “The Cathedral and the Bazaar”) is:
When you lose interest in a program, your last duty to it is to hand
it off to a competent successor.
<URL:http://www.catb.org/~esr/writings/cathedral-bazaar/cathedral-bazaar/ar01s02.html>
Whether successful or not, I can testify that Skip has been
conscientious in following this principle: he has been asking parties
who have demonstrated interest and/or competence for some time now to
take over maintenance of the ‘lockfile’ library.
> I continue to get bug reports, some from OS package maintainers or
> maintainers of applications which use lockfile. Lots of these people
> seem demanding of my time (which makes me even less interested in
> lockfile maintenance).
I don't know of any good way to make those decrease, without some other
contact point for the project becoming more prominent than yours.
> Is there a "correct" way to abandon the damn thing?
You have, IMO, already put in sufficient public effort to give
opportunity to potential maintainers.
I would say that, in the case of the ‘lockfile’ library, you have
already discharged your responsibilities under the above principle; and
can politely let each person know they are on their own for maintenance.
--
\ “I've always wanted to be somebody, but I see now that I should |
`\ have been more specific.” —Jane Wagner, via Lily Tomlin |
_o__) |
Ben Finney
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: What's the "right" way to abandon an open source package? Ben Finney <ben@benfinney.id.au> - 2014-07-02 09:18 +1000
csiph-web