Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #73817

Re: What's the "right" way to abandon an open source package?

Path csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!dedibox.gegeweb.org!gegeweb.eu!nntpfeed.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <python-python-list@m.gmane.org>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.041
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 0.92; '*S*': 0.00; 'sufficient': 0.05; 'over,': 0.07; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'bug': 0.12; 'competent': 0.16; 'finney': 0.16; 'imo,': 0.16; 'maintainers': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'url:catb': 0.16; 'url:~esr': 0.16; 'reports,': 0.19; 'not,': 0.20; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.23; 'library,': 0.24; 'skip': 0.24; "i've": 0.25; 'asking': 0.27; 'header:X-Complaints- To:1': 0.27; 'tried': 0.27; 'point': 0.28; 'have,': 0.30; '(which': 0.31; 'program,': 0.31; 'becoming': 0.31; 'writes:': 0.31; 'subject:the': 0.34; 'but': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'library.': 0.36; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'url:org': 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'effort': 0.37; 'project': 0.37; 'ben': 0.38; 'to:addr:python- list': 0.38; 'that,': 0.38; 'subject:" ': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:org': 0.40; 'even': 0.60; 'skip:u 10': 0.60; 'interest': 0.64; 'more': 0.64; 'skip:\xe2 10': 0.65; 'contact': 0.67; 'duty': 0.68; 'lose': 0.68; '8bit%:43': 0.74; 'hand': 0.80; 'abandon': 0.84; 'cathedral': 0.84; 'received:125': 0.84; 'subject:source': 0.84; '\xe2\x80\x9cthe': 0.91; 'yours.': 0.93
X-Injected-Via-Gmane http://gmane.org/
To python-list@python.org
From Ben Finney <ben@benfinney.id.au>
Subject Re: What's the "right" way to abandon an open source package?
Date Wed, 02 Jul 2014 09:18:59 +1000
References <CANc-5UwWVRyQeN15pWSJbeGimPPF7YmBdp6mP-3c5GW7FyK8dQ@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding 8bit
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host jigong.madmonks.org
X-Public-Key-ID 0xAC128405
X-Public-Key-Fingerprint 517C F14B B2F3 98B0 CB35 4855 B8B2 4C06 AC12 8405
X-Public-Key-URL http://www.benfinney.id.au/contact/bfinney-pubkey.asc
X-Post-From Ben Finney <bignose+hates-spam@benfinney.id.au>
User-Agent Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock sha1:7xVEhcPYcBw+IkL2K1rqf5pWV68=
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.15
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.11390.1404256759.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 39
NNTP-Posting-Host 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace 1404256759 news.xs4all.nl 2964 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:38804
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:73817

Show key headers only | View raw


Skip Montanaro <skip@python.org> writes:

> I've tried to find people to take it over, but so far unsuccessfully.

The principle (laid out by ESR in “The Cathedral and the Bazaar”) is:

    When you lose interest in a program, your last duty to it is to hand
    it off to a competent successor.

    <URL:http://www.catb.org/~esr/writings/cathedral-bazaar/cathedral-bazaar/ar01s02.html>

Whether successful or not, I can testify that Skip has been
conscientious in following this principle: he has been asking parties
who have demonstrated interest and/or competence for some time now to
take over maintenance of the ‘lockfile’ library.

> I continue to get bug reports, some from OS package maintainers or
> maintainers of applications which use lockfile. Lots of these people
> seem demanding of my time (which makes me even less interested in
> lockfile maintenance).

I don't know of any good way to make those decrease, without some other
contact point for the project becoming more prominent than yours.

> Is there a "correct" way to abandon the damn thing?

You have, IMO, already put in sufficient public effort to give
opportunity to potential maintainers.

I would say that, in the case of the ‘lockfile’ library, you have
already discharged your responsibilities under the above principle; and
can politely let each person know they are on their own for maintenance.

-- 
 \     “I've always wanted to be somebody, but I see now that I should |
  `\           have been more specific.” —Jane Wagner, via Lily Tomlin |
_o__)                                                                  |
Ben Finney

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: What's the "right" way to abandon an open source package? Ben Finney <ben@benfinney.id.au> - 2014-07-02 09:18 +1000

csiph-web