Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #94831
| From | Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: debugging during package development |
| Date | 2015-08-01 02:44 -0400 |
| References | <87fv43y6z4.fsf@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.1125.1438411508.3674.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On 8/1/2015 12:21 AM, Seb wrote: > It seems too cumbersome to have to update `sys.path` to include the > development tree of a package (and sub-packages) that's still very > young. With lots of debugging to do, the last thing I'd want is to > worry about the search path. So I've been searching for better ways to > work, but I can't seem hit the right keywords and come with all sorts of > tangentially related stuff. I'm sure there must be some tool that sets > up the development environment when the package source is not on > `sys.path`. Any advice on this topic would be appreciated. I am not sure what you are asking, but do you know about .pth files in site-packages? For each python installed, I put in site-packages a python.pth containing one line "F:/python". That file contains my project directory, call it x/ Running any version of python, 'from x import y' or 'from x.y import z' just works, the same as if x/ *were* in site-packages, and will be if I ever distribute the x package. No fuss with search paths; python plugs x into site-packages for me. I do not know where this is documented. -- Terry Jan Reedy
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: debugging during package development Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2015-08-01 02:44 -0400
csiph-web