Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #29821
| References | <CAN1F8qUxbhK8HqRr7RVUQreb2QkAsm+Y9q0LKR0eK1akYbNsLg@mail.gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-09-24 02:12 +1000 |
| Subject | Re: Capitalization for variable that holds a class |
| From | Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.1124.1348416749.27098.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 1:48 AM, Joshua Landau <joshua.landau.ws@gmail.com> wrote: > Simple question: > > [myClass() for myClass in myClasses] > vs > [MyClass() for MyClass in myClasses] > > Fight. > > (When considering, substitute in a more real-world example like [Token() for > Token in allTokens] or [token() for token in allTokens]) An interesting point! I assume you're basing this on the PEP 8 recommendation: http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0008/#class-names Since there's no difference between a "class" and a "variable containing a class" or a "pointer to a class" or any other such concept, it makes sense to capitalize MyClass in your example, if you are guaranteeing that they're all classes. And certainly a long-lived variable ought to be named in CapWords. However, all you're really doing is taking a bunch of callables, calling them, and making a list of the results. I'd therefore be inclined to _not_ capitalize it. YMMV though. ChrisA
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Capitalization for variable that holds a class Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-09-24 02:12 +1000 Re: Capitalization for variable that holds a class Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-09-23 21:42 +0000
csiph-web