Re: stackoverflow and c.l.py

From	memilanuk <memilanuk@gmail.com>
Subject	Re: stackoverflow and c.l.py
Date	2011-09-14 06:05 -0700
References	<CAB4yi1Nc04-6zw98WW+rss9u80amNbmk7GpMw-b0uHDdiRgC7w@mail.gmail.com> <j4p9k5$7ij$1@dough.gmane.org> <j4q6vj$n8e$1@dough.gmane.org> <CAPTjJmrnjRmp9HB5GAOC0HBOXfs3Xix5VeJhQCf2f0JprNn0WQ@mail.gmail.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Message-ID	<mailman.1115.1316005538.27778.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw

On 09/14/2011 05:47 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> The SNR here isn't bad either. Most of the spam gets filtered out, and
> even stuff like Ranting Rick posts can be of some amusement when it's
> a slow day...

I subscribe to the list via Gmane, and if 'most of the spam' gets 
filtered out, I'd hate to see how much gets submitted as I still see 2-5 
minimum blatant spam per day on here.

Rick & Xang Li are two examples of what you *don't* see (or at least I 
don't) @ SO

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: stackoverflow and c.l.py memilanuk <memilanuk@gmail.com> - 2011-09-14 06:05 -0700
  Re: stackoverflow and c.l.py "Rhodri James" <rhodri@wildebst.demon.co.uk> - 2011-09-15 00:26 +0100
  Re: stackoverflow and c.l.py Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-09-15 09:58 +1000
    Re: stackoverflow and c.l.py Westley Martínez <anikom15@gmail.com> - 2011-09-14 20:05 -0700
    Re: stackoverflow and c.l.py john <gnujohn@gmail.com> - 2011-09-15 01:01 -0700
    Re: stackoverflow and c.l.py Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-09-15 18:39 +1000

csiph-web