Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #35201
| References | <kav8ni$f38$1@news.albasani.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-12-21 02:05 +1100 |
| Subject | Re: Python3 + sqlite3: Where's the bug? |
| From | Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.1100.1356015940.29569.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 1:52 AM, Johannes Bauer <dfnsonfsduifb@gmx.de> wrote:
> def fetchmanychks(cursor):
> cursor.execute("SELECT id FROM foo;")
> while True:
> result = cursor.fetchmany()
> if len(result) == 0:
> break
> for x in result:
> yield x
I'm not familiar with sqlite, but from working with other databases,
I'm wondering if possibly your commits are breaking the fetchmany.
Would it spoil your performance improvements to do all the fetchmany
calls before yielding anything? Alternatively, can you separate the
two by opening a separate database connection for the foo-reading (so
it isn't affected by the commit)?
ChrisA
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Python3 + sqlite3: Where's the bug? Johannes Bauer <dfnsonfsduifb@gmx.de> - 2012-12-20 15:52 +0100
Re: Python3 + sqlite3: Where's the bug? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-12-21 02:05 +1100
Re: Python3 + sqlite3: Where's the bug? Johannes Bauer <dfnsonfsduifb@gmx.de> - 2012-12-20 16:20 +0100
Re: Python3 + sqlite3: Where's the bug? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-12-21 02:55 +1100
Re: Python3 + sqlite3: Where's the bug? Hans Mulder <hansmu@xs4all.nl> - 2012-12-20 17:35 +0100
Re: Python3 + sqlite3: Where's the bug? inq1ltd <inq1ltd@inqvista.com> - 2012-12-20 10:57 -0500
csiph-web