Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #44406
| Path | csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!eweka.nl!lightspeed.eweka.nl!194.109.133.87.MISMATCH!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed1.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Return-Path | <insideshoes@gmail.com> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.058 |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 0.88; '*S*': 0.00; 'subject:not': 0.03; 'modifying': 0.07; 'iterate': 0.09; 'pixel': 0.09; 'second.': 0.09; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.11; '>>': 0.16; 'data...': 0.16; 'in-memory': 0.16; 'iterated': 0.16; 'once.': 0.16; 'traverse': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'trying': 0.19; 'file,': 0.19; 'email addr:gmail.com>': 0.22; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.22; 'creating': 0.23; 'parse': 0.24; 'file.': 0.24; 'cc:2**0': 0.24; '>': 0.26; 'suggested': 0.26; 'read,': 0.26; 'header:In-Reply- To:1': 0.27; 'chris': 0.29; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; 'code': 0.31; 'lines': 0.31; 'once,': 0.31; 'file': 0.32; 'option': 0.32; 'another': 0.32; 'text': 0.33; 'open': 0.33; '(e.g.': 0.33; 'fri,': 0.33; 'knows': 0.35; 'something': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'really': 0.36; "he's": 0.36; 'object,': 0.36; 'done': 0.36; 'useful': 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'half': 0.37; 'so,': 0.37; 'two': 0.37; 'list': 0.37; 'list.': 0.37; 'pm,': 0.38; 'anything': 0.39; 'how': 0.40; 'read': 0.60; 'easy': 0.60; 'full': 0.61; 'new': 0.61; 'course': 0.61; 'first': 0.61; 'information': 0.63; 'more': 0.64; 'taking': 0.65; '(that': 0.65; 'talking': 0.65; 'close': 0.67; 'yes': 0.68; '26,': 0.68; '500': 0.70; 'touch': 0.74; 'subject:For': 0.78; 'otten': 0.84; 'to:none': 0.92; '2013': 0.98 |
| DKIM-Signature | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:cc:content-type; bh=7/NxwqlY937//uBu4IGlT1bzsPqvJiWunJzWxDYOONQ=; b=IOEAsf3s37TibFdQ7QlJwH8PF1QFg4+tTl/Ck975hoTDvgHoh220tMCSeQYrs3Iswh bh6SRdxlG2xNNpxM0OGRDTe5pzuXnpU2cZLb8ZKGb2iMJsp3IwfooQR1L/W4mT1w78eN XYRru//zGEUyjLAth4TZLHdR7CqKMc4nUs+h3l3OjORyT12L8hw6tpTFp4P4crMcSuFz oXzaXUq9FZWF4CrrTxEf5/8BuAQSCdMpQa4IYvOJ25trBryUooeVy6G47c7CHYHbx94B VrcfS6uq45do5VPq7TKsKxu+jrFeRosW1ttQs2Mym8BqlXayVFNkwAajoFn/0J2VEwLE f8fQ== |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| X-Received | by 10.42.64.135 with SMTP id g7mr23870590ici.37.1366982448379; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 06:20:48 -0700 (PDT) |
| In-Reply-To | <CAPTjJmpKrQzu3W76FFOw6zOvGEjiHCD6mxuz=5Uz92-c4F64oA@mail.gmail.com> |
| References | <CAFqGZRF4s_+9R4qDZTmFD7OWWMTn_YnhjKNMh8gY97ng5tyr9g@mail.gmail.com> <kldg7b$20b$1@ger.gmane.org> <CAFqGZRGoh=hTG7PZgxNaaKgq8Z_QHyqVQZ+voe1z_KY+-ysjug@mail.gmail.com> <CAPTjJmpKrQzu3W76FFOw6zOvGEjiHCD6mxuz=5Uz92-c4F64oA@mail.gmail.com> |
| Date | Fri, 26 Apr 2013 18:50:48 +0530 |
| Subject | Re: Nested For loop not running full |
| From | inshu chauhan <insideshoes@gmail.com> |
| Cc | "python-list@python.org" <python-list@python.org> |
| Content-Type | multipart/alternative; boundary=90e6ba5bbaa3401c0604db4367ff |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.15 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.1095.1366982457.3114.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| Lines | 128 |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 2001:888:2000:d::a6 |
| X-Trace | 1366982457 news.xs4all.nl 15904 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:57086 |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@xs4all.nl |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.python:44406 |
Show key headers only | View raw
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
, 2013 at 3:15 PM, Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 7:36 PM, inshu chauhan <insideshoes@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 2:39 PM, Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> wrote:
> >>
> >> f = open(...)
> >>
> >> in the code you are not showing with
> >>
> >> f == list(open(...))
> >
> > f is just a text file(csv format).. so why list ??
>
> (That should be =, not ==)
>
> Instead of having an open file object, you would instead have a list
> of the lines in the file. That can be iterated over more than once.
>
> >> The reasonable thing to do is of course to move the preprocessing (e.g.
> >> csv-
> >> parsing) out of the sy and sx loops.
> >
> >
> > I did this but again then what I intend to do is not really happening,
> For
> > every pixel I read, I want to traverse the full file, so that the
> > information I am taking from pixel have to match in one of the line in
> the
> > file. Can this be done by modifying my code ? or something new has to be
> > devised ?
>
> How large is the file? There are two easy solutions:
>
> 1) Open and close the file every time you touch a pixel
> 2) Open the file once, read it all into memory, and then iterate over
> the in-memory copy every pixel
>
> If your file is insanely large then the first option may be better,
> but for anything less than five yottabytes, go with the second. (Okay,
> I may be exaggerating slightly... let's say anything less than half
> your RAM. So if you have 10YB of memory, then I wasn't exaggerating.)
> That's why Peter suggested creating a list; you iterate over the list.
> Another way to do it is to parse the file once and retain a more
> efficient and useful structured form of the data... which is the other
> thing Peter suggested ("move the preprocessing (e.g. csv-
> parsing) out of the sy and sx loops").
>
> So, yeah. Listen to Peter Otten, he knows what he's talking about :)
>
> ChrisA
>
Yes I am trying Peter's way and my file is just 500 KB .. :)
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Nested For loop not running full inshu chauhan <insideshoes@gmail.com> - 2013-04-26 18:50 +0530
csiph-web