Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #22297

Re: unittest: assertRaises() with an instance instead of a type

From Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu>
Subject Re: unittest: assertRaises() with an instance instead of a type
Date 2012-03-28 14:26 -0400
References <pncb49-ur7.ln1@satorlaser.homedns.org>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.1088.1332959227.3037.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw


On 3/28/2012 8:28 AM, Ulrich Eckhardt wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'm currently writing some tests for the error handling of some code. In
> this scenario, I must make sure that both the correct exception is
> raised and that the contained error code is correct:
>
>
> try:
> foo()
> self.fail('exception not raised')
> catch MyException as e:
> self.assertEqual(e.errorcode, SOME_FOO_ERROR)
> catch Exception:
> self.fail('unexpected exception raised')
>
>
> This is tedious to write and read. The docs mention this alternative:
>
>
> with self.assertRaises(MyException) as cm:
> foo()
> self.assertEqual(cm.the_exception.errorcode, SOME_FOO_ERROR)

Exceptions can have multiple attributes. This allows the tester to 
exactly specify what attributes to test.

> This is shorter, but I think there's an alternative syntax possible that
> would be even better:
>
> with self.assertRaises(MyException(SOME_FOO_ERROR)):
> foo()

I presume that if this worked the way you want, all attributes would 
have to match. The message part of builtin exceptions is allowed to 
change, so hard-coding an exact expected message makes tests fragile. 
This is a problem with doctest.

> Here, assertRaises() is not called with an exception type but with an
> exception instance. I'd implement it something like this:
>
> def assertRaises(self, exception, ...):
> # divide input parameter into type and instance
> if isinstance(exception, Exception):
> exception_type = type(exception)
> else:
> exception_type = exception
> exception = None
> # call testee and verify results
> try:
> ...call function here...
> except exception_type as e:
> if not exception is None:
> self.assertEqual(e, exception)

Did you use tabs? They do not get preserved indefinitely, so they are 
bad for posting.

> This of course requires the exception to be equality-comparable.

Equality comparison is by id. So this code will not do what you want.

You can, of course, write a custom AssertX subclass that at least works 
for your custom exception class.

-- 
Terry Jan Reedy

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

unittest: assertRaises() with an instance instead of a type Ulrich Eckhardt <ulrich.eckhardt@dominolaser.com> - 2012-03-28 14:28 +0200
  Re: unittest: assertRaises() with an instance instead of a type Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-03-28 18:07 +0000
    Re: unittest: assertRaises() with an instance instead of a type Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2012-03-29 12:55 +1100
      Re: unittest: assertRaises() with an instance instead of a type Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-03-29 06:35 +0000
      Re: unittest: assertRaises() with an instance instead of a type Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2012-03-29 08:55 +0200
      Re: unittest: assertRaises() with an instance instead of a type Steve Howell <showell30@yahoo.com> - 2012-03-28 22:50 -0700
    Re: unittest: assertRaises() with an instance instead of a type Ulrich Eckhardt <ulrich.eckhardt@dominolaser.com> - 2012-03-29 09:08 +0200
      Re: unittest: assertRaises() with an instance instead of a type Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2012-03-29 09:48 +0200
      Re: unittest: assertRaises() with an instance instead of a type Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-03-30 02:45 +0000
        Re: unittest: assertRaises() with an instance instead of a type Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2012-03-30 10:45 -0700
    Re: unittest: assertRaises() with an instance instead of a type Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2012-03-29 08:35 -0700
      Re: unittest: assertRaises() with an instance instead of a type Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-03-30 02:53 +0000
  Re: unittest: assertRaises() with an instance instead of a type Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2012-03-28 14:26 -0400
    Re: unittest: assertRaises() with an instance instead of a type Ulrich Eckhardt <ulrich.eckhardt@dominolaser.com> - 2012-03-29 09:28 +0200
      Re: unittest: assertRaises() with an instance instead of a type Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2012-03-29 11:04 -0400
    tabs/spaces (was: Re: unittest: assertRaises() with an instance instead of a type) Ulrich Eckhardt <ulrich.eckhardt@dominolaser.com> - 2012-03-29 09:18 +0200
      Re: tabs/spaces (was: Re: unittest: assertRaises() with an instance instead of a type) Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2012-03-29 08:49 -0400
      Re: tabs/spaces Dave Angel <d@davea.name> - 2012-03-29 11:16 -0400
      Re: tabs/spaces Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2012-03-29 11:25 -0400
        Re: tabs/spaces Ulrich Eckhardt <ulrich.eckhardt@dominolaser.com> - 2012-03-30 09:05 +0200
          Re: tabs/spaces Dave Angel <d@davea.name> - 2012-03-30 08:47 -0400
            Re: tabs/spaces Ulrich Eckhardt <ulrich.eckhardt@dominolaser.com> - 2012-04-02 09:12 +0200
              Re: tabs/spaces Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2012-04-02 03:42 -0400

csiph-web