Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #72835

Re: Forking PyPI package

From Akira Li <4kir4.1i@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Forking PyPI package
Date 2014-06-06 15:26 +0400
References (1 earlier) <CAPTjJmqTkY3g21fvn-xUf26Ua9AzTYKMCGr1i45R2chyRyVNrQ@mail.gmail.com> <mailman.10460.1401400498.18130.python-list@python.org> <1qsp8axgu3ba4$.24u4g11ha8ec.dlg@40tude.net> <mailman.10753.1401989883.18130.python-list@python.org> <zljzlakpibfv.245cmk9bi6ks.dlg@40tude.net>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.10810.1402053998.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw


Wiktor <look@signature.invalid> writes:

> On Fri, 6 Jun 2014 03:37:56 +1000, Chris Angelico wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 2:56 AM, Wiktor <look@signature.invalid> wrote:
>>>   I guess, I'll try to do what Chris proposed. Forget about this
>>> implementation and write python script from the scratch looking only at the
>>> original JavaScript version. :-/
>> 
>> Sadly, that may be your only safe option.
>> 
>> Let this be a lesson to all: If you want something to be free
>> software, make it very clear, because "it looks like he meant that to
>> be open source" just isn't enough :(
>
>   Lesson taken. ;-)
>   Interesting thing is, that for another 4 people, lack of license in this
> script wasn't problem to publish its modified version. I've just searched
> phrase "pwdhash" on GitHub, to simply check if someone else hadn't port
> this script to Python3 earlier, or maybe ported it (with proper license) to
> Python2 so I would have better start. And I've found practically the same
> script here: https://github.com/ali01/pwdhash.py, forked then 3 times.
>   Of course I'm not going to act now "Oh, they could do that without
> consequences, so why should I bother?" - no, I'm going to do this right (as
> a good start in OS community) - but it feels awkward now. ;-)

Have you tried to open an issue about clarifying the license terms [1] ?

[1]: https://github.com/abbot/pwdhash/issues/new

Or better yet, submit a pull request that specifies the license to the
standard you need?

I've dealt with the author in the past. I see no reason, he would refuse
to accept PR if license=BSD in setup.py is not enough.


--
akira

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Forking PyPI package Wiktor <look@signature.invalid> - 2014-05-29 02:31 +0200
  Re: Forking PyPI package Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2014-05-28 22:06 -0400
  Re: Forking PyPI package Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-05-29 17:40 +1000
    Re: Forking PyPI package Duncan Booth <duncan.booth@invalid.invalid> - 2014-05-29 07:56 +0000
      Re: Forking PyPI package Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-05-29 18:06 +1000
  Re: Forking PyPI package Wiktor <look@signature.invalid> - 2014-05-29 10:49 +0200
  Re: Forking PyPI package Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2014-05-29 15:54 -0600
    Re: Forking PyPI package Wiktor <look@signature.invalid> - 2014-06-05 18:56 +0200
      Re: Forking PyPI package Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-06-06 03:37 +1000
        Re: Forking PyPI package Wiktor <look@signature.invalid> - 2014-06-06 02:15 +0200
          Re: Forking PyPI package Akira Li <4kir4.1i@gmail.com> - 2014-06-06 15:26 +0400
  Re: Forking PyPI package Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-05-30 10:26 +1000

csiph-web