Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #22265
| Path | csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!news.mixmin.net!feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Return-Path | <python-python-list@m.gmane.org> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.010 |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 0.98; '*S*': 0.00; 'warnings': 0.05; 'be:': 0.09; 'module,': 0.09; 'parameter': 0.09; 'subject:create': 0.09; 'used.': 0.09; 'python': 0.11; 'print': 0.15; '**kwargs)': 0.16; '**kwargs):': 0.16; 'chris,': 0.16; 'decorator': 0.16; 'executed': 0.16; 'func': 0.16; 'helps!': 0.16; 'received:80.91': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229': 0.16; 'received:gmane.org': 0.16; 'received:list': 0.16; 'solution,': 0.16; 'subject: \n ': 0.16; 'though)': 0.16; 'versions': 0.18; 'def': 0.20; 'wrote:': 0.21; 'function': 0.22; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.22; 'header:User- Agent:1': 0.23; 'idea': 0.26; '(the': 0.26; 'pass': 0.28; "i've": 0.28; 'bit': 0.28; 'pm,': 0.28; 'that.': 0.28; '27,': 0.29; 'enhanced': 0.29; 'skip:@ 10': 0.29; 'though.': 0.29; 'code': 0.29; 'class': 0.29; 'question': 0.30; 'raise': 0.30; 'chris': 0.32; 'option': 0.32; 'work,': 0.32; 'suggestion': 0.32; 'could': 0.34; 'thanks': 0.34; 'subject:new': 0.35; 'see,': 0.35; 'actually': 0.35; 'version': 0.36; "i'm": 0.36; 'done': 0.36; 'sure': 0.36; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.36; 'but': 0.36; 'next': 0.38; 'comment': 0.38; 'received:org': 0.38; 'skip:b 20': 0.39; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.39; 'think': 0.40; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'mar': 0.61; 'single': 0.61; 'name': 0.61; 'call': 0.62; 'lists,': 0.63; 'more': 0.63; 'fill': 0.65; 'hope': 0.65; 'incorporate': 0.66; '2012': 0.69; 'idea.': 0.72; 'facilities': 0.76; '11:50': 0.84; 'gelonida': 0.84; 'overlooked': 0.84; 'subject:warning': 0.91; 'have.': 0.93 |
| X-Injected-Via-Gmane | http://gmane.org/ |
| To | python-list@python.org |
| From | Gelonida N <gelonida@gmail.com> |
| Subject | Re: best way to create warning for obsolete functions and call new one |
| Date | Wed, 28 Mar 2012 09:51:52 +0200 |
| References | <jkqjd4$1cp$1@dough.gmane.org> <CAPTjJmrCirmKrfsVkcidjZXuSYVto2M=XEJ6qGJXy6cSDZdo4g@mail.gmail.com> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host | unicorn.dungeon.de |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.28) Gecko/20120313 Lightning/1.0b2 "" |
| In-Reply-To | <CAPTjJmrCirmKrfsVkcidjZXuSYVto2M=XEJ6qGJXy6cSDZdo4g@mail.gmail.com> |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.12 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.1064.1332921126.3037.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| Lines | 80 |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 2001:888:2000:d::a6 |
| X-Trace | 1332921126 news.xs4all.nl 6955 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:56873 |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@xs4all.nl |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.python:22265 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Hi Chris,
On 03/26/2012 11:50 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 7:26 AM, Gelonida N <gelonida@gmail.com> wrote:
>> One option I though of would be:
>>
>> def obsolete_func(func):
>> def call_old(*args, **kwargs):
>> print "func is old psl use new one"
>> return func(*args, **kwargs)
>> return call_old
>>
>> and
>>
>> def get_time(a='high'):
>> return a + 'noon'
>
> That's a reasonable idea. Incorporate Dan's suggestion of using
> DeprecationWarning.
>
Will do that.
> You may want to try decorator syntax:
>
> def was(oldname):
> def _(func):
> globals()[oldname]=func
> return func
> return _
>
> @was("get_thyme")
> def get_time(a='high'):
> return a + 'noon'
>
> That won't raise DeprecationWarning, though. It's a very simple
> assignment. The was() internal function could be enhanced to do a bit
> more work, but I'm not sure what version of Python you're using and
> what introspection facilities you have. But if you're happy with the
> old versions coming up with (*args,**kwargs) instead of their
> parameter lists, it's not difficult:
I'm using python 2.6 and sometimes still 2.5 (the latter is not
important for this question though)
Good idea about the decorators.
I overlooked to see, that if done properly a decorator will not add call
time overhead for calling the function with it's new name
>
> def was(oldname):
> def _(func):
> def bounce(*args,**kwargs):
> # raise DeprecationWarning
> return func(*args,**kwargs)
> globals()[oldname]=bounce
> return func
> return _
>
> I've never actually used the Python warnings module, but any line of
> code you fill in at the comment will be executed any time the old name
> is used. In any case, it's still used with the same convenient
> decorator. You could even unify multiple functions under a single new
> name:
>
> @was("foo")
> @was("bar")
> def quux(spam,ham):
> return ham.eat()
>
Now the next step will do write a decorator working for class methods.
I think I have a solution, but it would require to pass the class as
additional parameter to each decorator.
it would be
setattr(cls, oldname, finc)
> Hope that helps!
It does. Thanks again.
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: best way to create warning for obsolete functions and call new one Gelonida N <gelonida@gmail.com> - 2012-03-28 09:51 +0200
csiph-web