Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #37701
| Date | 2013-01-25 15:38 -0800 |
|---|---|
| From | Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> |
| Subject | Re: Retrieving an object from a set |
| References | <CAJ6cK1b=F5JXL=FN0qouS-idbE8xnVURm0ZZrZ8-DW2xbLNErg@mail.gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.1061.1359157582.2939.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On 01/25/2013 03:14 PM, Arnaud Delobelle wrote: > I've got a seemingly simple problem, but for which I cannot find a > simple solution. > > I have a set of objects (say S) containing an object which is equal to > a given object (say x). So > > x in S > > is true. So there is an object y in S which is equal to x. My > problem is how to retrieve y, without going through the whole set. > Here is a simple illustration with tuples (my actual scenario is not > with tuples but with a custom class): > >>>> y = (1, 2, 3) # This is the 'hidden object' >>>> S = set([y] + range(10000)) >>>> x = (1, 2, 3) >>>> x in S > True >>>> x is y > False > > I haven't found y. It's a very simple problem, and this is the > simplest solution I can think of: > > class FindEqual(object): > def __init__(self, obj): > self.obj = obj > def __hash__(self): > return hash(self.obj) > def __eq__(self, other): > equal = self.obj == other > if equal: > self.lastequal = other > return equal > >>>> yfinder = FindEqual(x) >>>> yfinder in S > True >>>> yfinder.lastequal is y > True > > I've found y! I'm not happy with this as it really is a trick. Is > there a cleaner solution? I don't know if there is a cleaner solution, and I quite like yours. Can you tell us, though, why you have to have y if x == y? Is there some subtle difference between the two equal objects? ~Ethan~
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Retrieving an object from a set Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2013-01-25 15:38 -0800
csiph-web