Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #22262

Re: python segfault

Path csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder2.enfer-du-nord.net!newsfeed.eweka.nl!eweka.nl!feeder3.eweka.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <michael.poeltl@univie.ac.at>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.196
X-Spam-Level *
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 0.62; '*S*': 0.01; ';-)': 0.03; 'fault': 0.07; 'function,': 0.09; 'python': 0.11; 'subject:python': 0.12; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.15; '2.7.2': 0.16; 'ubuntu,': 0.16; 'wien,': 0.16; 'zeros': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.21; 'exception': 0.22; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.22; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.23; '(or': 0.24; 'cc:no real name:2**0': 0.26; 'quite': 0.26; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.27; 'pm,': 0.28; 'equivalent.': 0.29; 'question': 0.30; 'raise': 0.30; 'cc:2**0': 0.31; 'asked': 0.31; 'hi,': 0.33; 'two': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'beginning': 0.35; 'why': 0.36; 'but': 0.36; 'charset:us-ascii': 0.36; 'thank': 0.37; 'subject:': 0.38; 'michael': 0.38; 'clear': 0.39; "can't": 0.39; 'large': 0.40; 'steps': 0.61; 'course': 0.61; 'content- disposition:inline': 0.62; 'skip:n 10': 0.62; 'skip:+ 10': 0.63; 'real': 0.63; 'most': 0.63; 'remove': 0.65; 'quick': 0.66; 'materials': 0.70; 'bound': 0.72; 'limit': 0.73; 'size.': 0.79; 'default': 0.81; 'obvious': 0.81; '(quick': 0.84; 'davea': 0.84; 'recursion': 0.84; 'true:': 0.84; 'voice:': 0.84; 'angel': 0.91; 'explained': 0.91
DKIM-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=univie.ac.at; s=rev2; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date; bh=wo5ZXXcazes10Na2DJWSZgvcEFi4nc23oTFvS+KchqM=; b=XujR1bJmMNN2E+UQU3nH8YfObkNh9R6PITe+0haEi8r2nMp+1WD/dNb4piYEVd/X6ygKc2Q2zRc7hIZnFlt3QJrVdvGtn8GuiQ0S1/CwOdO6JVgOK/Z7SQ9gClDE4FG36uPcXhCcaeliA/kpglUQzvmxUMGCkPhvWrTvciIG0Zc=;
Date Wed, 28 Mar 2012 08:16:50 +0200
From Michael Poeltl <michael.poeltl@univie.ac.at>
To Dave Angel <d@davea.name>
Subject Re: python segfault
References <20120327222757.GA22125@terra.cms.at> <4F727993.3070801@davea.name>
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition inline
In-Reply-To <4F727993.3070801@davea.name>
User-Agent Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Univie-Virus-Scan scanned by ClamAV on jarvis.univie.ac.at
Cc python-list@python.org
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.12
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.1060.1332915413.3037.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 68
NNTP-Posting-Host 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace 1332915413 news.xs4all.nl 6885 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:40222
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:22262

Show key headers only | View raw


hi,

* Dave Angel <d@davea.name> [2012-03-28 04:38]:
> On 03/27/2012 06:27 PM, Michael Poeltl wrote:
> >hi,
> >
> >can anybody tell why this 'little stupid *thing* of code' let's python-3.2.2, 2.6.X or python 2.7.2 segfault?
> >
> >>>def get_steps2(pos=0, steps=0):
> >...     if steps == 0:
> >...         pos = random.randint(-1,1)
> >...     if pos == 0:
> >...         return steps
> >...     steps += 2
> >...     pos += random.randint(-1,1)
> >...     return get_steps2(pos,steps)
> >...
> ><SNIP>
> >0
> >2
> >8
> >0
> >Segmentation fault
> >?>
> >
> >funny, isn't it?
> >I was able to reproduce this segfault on various machines (32bit 64bit), ubuntu, slackware, debian
> >python.X segfaults on all of them
> >
> >thx
> >Michael
> 
> Others have explained why you can't just raise the recursion limit
> to arbitrarily large values, and why there's no particular bound on
> the possible recursion size.  But the real question is why you don't
> do the completely trivial conversion to a non-recursive equivalent.
> 
> All you need do is add a while True:  to the beginning of the
> function, and remove the return statement.
yeah - of course 'while True' was the first, most obvious best way... ;-)
but I was asked if there was a way without 'while True'
and so I started the 'recursive function'

and quick quick; RuntimeError-Exception -> not thinking much -> just adding
two zeros to the default limit (quick and dirty) -> segfault ==> subject: python segfault ;-)

and that was my first time that I received a segfault and not an Exception

NOW it's quite clear ;-)

thank you!
Michael
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> DaveA
> 

-- 
Michael Poeltl
Computational Materials Physics      voice: +43-1-4277-51409
Univ. Wien, Sensengasse 8/12         fax:   +43-1-4277-9514 (or 9513) 
A-1090 Wien, AUSTRIA   cmp.mpi.univie.ac.at 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ubuntu-11.10 | vim-7.3 | python-3.2.2 | mutt-1.5.21 | elinks-0.12
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextNext in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: python segfault Michael Poeltl <michael.poeltl@univie.ac.at> - 2012-03-28 08:16 +0200
  Re: python segfault Kiuhnm <kiuhnm03.4t.yahoo.it> - 2012-03-28 15:59 +0200

csiph-web