Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #2408
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.dougwise.org!aioe.org!feeder.news-service.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!194.109.133.84.MISMATCH!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Return-Path | <debatem1@gmail.com> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.005 |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; 'pypi': 0.04; 'wed,': 0.04; '2.7': 0.05; 'chunk': 0.07; 'received:mail-qy0-f174.google.com': 0.07; "shouldn't": 0.07; 'python': 0.07; 'imported.': 0.09; 'pieces': 0.09; 'subject:method': 0.09; 'api': 0.11; 'pm,': 0.11; 'wrote:': 0.14; 'library': 0.15; 'cmp': 0.16; 'extensions,': 0.16; 'received:209.85.216.174': 0.16; 'subject:sort': 0.16; 'code.': 0.18; 'cc:no real name:2**0': 0.20; 'cc:2**0': 0.20; 'code': 0.22; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.22; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.22; '"not': 0.23; 'wonder': 0.24; 'guess': 0.26; '(in': 0.27; 'function': 0.27; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.28; 'string': 0.29; 'certainly': 0.29; 'push': 0.29; "python's": 0.29; 'sort': 0.30; 'least': 0.30; 'implement': 0.30; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.31; 'survive': 0.31; 'anyone': 0.31; 'pure': 0.33; 'community': 0.33; 'test': 0.33; 'using': 0.34; 'actually': 0.34; 'race,': 0.35; 'test.': 0.35; 'feature': 0.36; 'data': 0.37; 'received:209.85': 0.37; 'useful': 0.37; 'steven': 0.38; 'received:google.com': 0.38; 'but': 0.38; 'pretty': 0.38; 'sign': 0.38; 'not,': 0.39; 'set': 0.39; 'likely': 0.39; 'could': 0.39; 'received:209': 0.39; 'how': 0.39; 'solution': 0.40; 'would': 0.40; "it's": 0.40; 'header:Received:5': 0.40; 'fact,': 0.60; '2011': 0.62; 'took': 0.64; 'mar': 0.64; 'overall': 0.64; 'interest': 0.65; 'grab': 0.65; 'download.': 0.68; 'alternative': 0.69; 'offer': 0.72; '30,': 0.80; 'lose': 0.84; 'horse': 0.84; 'practical,': 0.84; 'subject:removal': 0.84 |
| DKIM-Signature | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=Qe/2l4B54G9DtkjvmKaUI9kRCTBbt/1RHYRN8ug28vc=; b=lBiNoM6QWT83H4YEtTL0QHqDh7KPg4I//7nX0uBpvqYb3Ycij66u02FPngp6FH/dXv as8gzhzEiy614fkjR+xytfmZMLDr3cRQcGgKgtMFBXKbr/G37a48Lvl2zCB7UcTgNhL1 BfHV+F+vVNikuAQfUUys2Ijfstw6cifWyQUd8= |
| DomainKey-Signature | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=SEYaUvB3lGBw5RJvGXm53r5KQT9AJfQsyj9aopjLxvrW6GwoChlSLfRgnH7+n7Vfb2 DSp4EdkpjTfXJqn4Q5Sr0z4rLDvZsZ4d8LxguFrB5ENA5iW2LhHfpJHAex9M4hBp7seo 2iUGMR7u5TbqBUwSl5TSW84CpwbQEKLg8cDgQ= |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| In-Reply-To | <4d93e360$0$29996$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> |
| References | <AANLkTi=Ux2wRJ8u=myd1jeneR+kZiFhtnwDLHm=GtFtV@mail.gmail.com> <mailman.1207.1300985048.1189.python-list@python.org> <4d8bd8a1$0$29977$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <mailman.1231.1301044708.1189.python-list@python.org> <4d8d1203$0$29977$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <mailman.1333.1301315748.1189.python-list@python.org> <4d90ac87$0$30000$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <20110329084657.GE26597@trout.vub.ac.be> <AANLkTinyEpTVaAjikP8M108ymj=J6LV2styp+Md-siwj@mail.gmail.com> <imtcab$r3r$1@dough.gmane.org> <mailman.9.1301475780.2990.python-list@python.org> <4d93e360$0$29996$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> |
| Date | Fri, 1 Apr 2011 14:31:09 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Guido rethinking removal of cmp from sort method |
| From | geremy condra <debatem1@gmail.com> |
| To | "Steven D'Aprano" <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 |
| Cc | python-list@python.org |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.12 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.105.1301693472.2990.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| Lines | 29 |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 82.94.164.166 |
| X-Trace | 1301693472 news.xs4all.nl 41117 [::ffff:82.94.164.166]:56538 |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@xs4all.nl |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:2408 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 7:13 PM, Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> wrote: <snip> > Or, an alternative approach would be for one of the cmp-supporters to > take the code for Python's sort routine, and implement your own sort-with- > cmp (in C, of course, a pure Python solution will likely be unusable) and > offer it as a download. For anyone who knows how to do C extensions, this > shouldn't be hard: just grab the code in Python 2.7 and make it a stand- > alone function that can be imported. > > If you get lots of community interest in this, that is a good sign that > the solution is useful and practical, and then you can push to have it > included in the standard library or even as a built-in. > > And if not, well, at least you will be able to continue using cmp in your > own code. I don't have a horse in this race, but I do wonder how much of Python could actually survive this test. My first (uneducated) guess is "not very much"- we would almost certainly lose large pieces of the string API and other builtins, and I have no doubt at all that a really significant chunk of the standard library would vanish as well. In fact, looking at the data I took from PyPI a while back, it's pretty clear that Python's feature set would look very different overall if we applied this test to everything. Geremy Condra
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Guido rethinking removal of cmp from sort method Antoon Pardon <Antoon.Pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> - 2011-03-30 11:06 +0200
Re: Guido rethinking removal of cmp from sort method Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-03-31 02:13 +0000
Re: Guido rethinking removal of cmp from sort method Antoon Pardon <Antoon.Pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> - 2011-03-31 11:41 +0200
Re: Guido rethinking removal of cmp from sort method Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2011-03-31 04:59 -0700
Re: Guido rethinking removal of cmp from sort method geremy condra <debatem1@gmail.com> - 2011-04-01 14:31 -0700
Re: Guido rethinking removal of cmp from sort method Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-04-02 00:41 +0000
Re: Guido rethinking removal of cmp from sort method geremy condra <debatem1@gmail.com> - 2011-04-01 18:22 -0700
Re: Guido rethinking removal of cmp from sort method Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-04-02 11:01 +0000
Re: Guido rethinking removal of cmp from sort method geremy condra <debatem1@gmail.com> - 2011-04-02 23:22 -0700
Re: Guido rethinking removal of cmp from sort method Brian Quinlan <brian@sweetapp.com> - 2011-04-03 16:34 +1000
Re: Guido rethinking removal of cmp from sort method Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-04-03 10:21 +0000
Re: Guido rethinking removal of cmp from sort method geremy condra <debatem1@gmail.com> - 2011-04-03 12:58 -0700
Re: Guido rethinking removal of cmp from sort method Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-01 19:29 -0700
Re: Guido rethinking removal of cmp from sort method Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-04-02 13:43 +1100
Re: Guido rethinking removal of cmp from sort method Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-04-02 11:27 +0000
csiph-web