Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #13152
| From | Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: Idioms combining 'next(items)' and 'for item in items:' |
| Date | 2011-09-11 20:45 -0400 |
| References | <j4gea4$m3b$1@dough.gmane.org> <CALwzidkeRA69p+Vw80xnE_sndx64zr2yXQsFZhS520KYbjxTxA@mail.gmail.com> <j4iomc$te4$1@dough.gmane.org> <CAPTjJmrXNjoccWAjwPO7yGHjQsruvJ7Kn6WWum6ywwWd+GZpoQ@mail.gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.1010.1315788359.27778.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On 9/11/2011 6:41 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 2:47 AM, Terry Reedy<tjreedy@udel.edu> wrote:
>> What you are saying is a) that the following code
>>
>> for title in ['amazinG', 'a helL of a fiGHT', '', 'igNordEd']:
>> print(fix_title(title))
> At least in Python 3.2, this isn't the case. StopIteration breaks the
> loop only if it's raised during the assignment, not during the body.
It breaks the loop *silently* only if ...
>>>> x=iter([1,2,3,4,5])
>>>> for i in x:
> print("%d - %d"%(i,next(x)))
>
> 1 - 2
> 3 - 4
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "<pyshell#281>", line 2, in<module>
> print("%d - %d"%(i,next(x)))
> StopIteration
whereas, you are right, it breaks it noisily in the body. So Ian's claim
that StopIteration must be caught to avoid silent termination is not
true. Thanks for pointing out what I saw but did not cognize the full
implication of before. A better exception and an error message with an
explaination might still be a good idea, though.
--
Terry Jan Reedy
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Idioms combining 'next(items)' and 'for item in items:' Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2011-09-11 20:45 -0400
csiph-web