Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #107471

Re: How much sanity checking is required for function inputs?

Path csiph.com!news.swapon.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail
From Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Subject Re: How much sanity checking is required for function inputs?
Date Thu, 21 Apr 2016 19:10:47 -0700
Lines 17
Message-ID <mailman.1.1461290981.2861.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
References <5713E52D.3060407@icloud.com> <1461131475.4042173.584042297.03DAB00E@webmail.messagingengine.com> <57171D23.40709@stoneleaf.us> <1461133057.4046578.584060569.2DD34821@webmail.messagingengine.com> <57185E88.30201@yahoo.com> <57197FC3.4030701@icloud.com> <57198827.1020608@stoneleaf.us>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Trace news.uni-berlin.de tvt0w5jKa6KjJo6axinBZAzIwnLu1si2LOeMXdomoQ0Q==
Return-Path <ethan@stoneleaf.us>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.012
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 0.98; '*S*': 0.00; 'exception.': 0.07; 'sanity': 0.07; 'subject:How': 0.09; 'from:addr:ethan': 0.09; 'from:addr:stoneleaf.us': 0.09; 'from:name:ethan furman': 0.09; 'message-id:@stoneleaf.us': 0.09; 'value.': 0.15; 'knight': 0.16; 'received:io': 0.16; 'received:psf.io': 0.16; 'subject:required': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.24; 'header:User- Agent:1': 0.26; 'initial': 0.28; '~ethan~': 0.29; 'raise': 0.29; 'class': 0.33; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.36; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'pm,': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'two': 0.37; 'skip:p 20': 0.38; 'test': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'your': 0.60; 'charset:windows-1252': 0.62; 'better.': 0.66; 'incorporate': 0.66; 'validate': 0.76; 'positions.': 0.84; 'subject:much': 0.91
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0
In-Reply-To <57197FC3.4030701@icloud.com>
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.22
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Mailman-Original-Message-ID <57198827.1020608@stoneleaf.us>
X-Mailman-Original-References <5713E52D.3060407@icloud.com> <1461131475.4042173.584042297.03DAB00E@webmail.messagingengine.com> <57171D23.40709@stoneleaf.us> <1461133057.4046578.584060569.2DD34821@webmail.messagingengine.com> <57185E88.30201@yahoo.com> <57197FC3.4030701@icloud.com>
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:107471

Show key headers only | View raw


On 04/21/2016 06:34 PM, Christopher Reimer wrote:

> class PieceFactory(object):
 > [...]

Better.

> I do plan to incorporate a sanity test in each Piece class to validate
> the initial position value. Pawns have 16 specific positions. Bishop,
> Knight and Rook each have four specific positions. King and Queen each
> have two specific positions. An invalid value will raise an exception.

This will make it so you cannot use your PieceFactory for custom setups.

--
~Ethan~

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: How much sanity checking is required for function inputs? Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2016-04-21 19:10 -0700

csiph-web