Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #33535

Re: Python Interview Questions

Path csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.albasani.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <python-python-list@m.gmane.org>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.005
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; 'operator': 0.03; 'subject:Python': 0.05; 'python': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'terry': 0.09; 'tuple': 0.09; '"import': 0.16; '3.3,': 0.16; 'appends': 0.16; 'iteration,': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'reedy': 0.16; 'sorts': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; 'tend': 0.17; 'jan': 0.18; 'bit': 0.21; 'subject:Questions': 0.22; 'tuples': 0.22; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'am,': 0.27; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.28; '100000': 0.29; 'lists': 0.31; 'much.': 0.33; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.33; 'faster': 0.35; 'received:org': 0.36; 'but': 0.36; 'item': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'skip:o 20': 0.38; 'system.': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'build': 0.39; 'short': 0.39; 'header:Received:5': 0.40; 'times': 0.63; 'more': 0.63; '10000': 0.65; 'direct': 0.69; '7-8%': 0.84; 'gap': 0.84; 'received:fios.verizon.net': 0.84; 'subject:Interview': 0.84; 'timings': 0.84; '410': 0.91; 'faster.': 0.91
X-Injected-Via-Gmane http://gmane.org/
To python-list@python.org
From Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu>
Subject Re: Python Interview Questions
Date Mon, 19 Nov 2012 03:27:46 -0500
References <1193768041.349129.26350@v3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> <55443eb7-847c-4f4c-8d04-1e6b507aac00@googlegroups.com> <50a8acdc$0$29978$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <roy-EFE1F1.08532518112012@news.panix.com> <50a911ec$0$29978$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <roy-B2D5FF.12535018112012@news.panix.com> <50a97de0$0$29983$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <roy-BD53B0.21093618112012@news.panix.com> <k8c65l$hmb$1@ger.gmane.org> <CALwzidnr-6pA9_MRZFixOvT--Yaa9UBU+9+7F0V9o+20Pg=gpg@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host pool-173-75-251-66.phlapa.fios.verizon.net
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121026 Thunderbird/16.0.2
In-Reply-To <CALwzidnr-6pA9_MRZFixOvT--Yaa9UBU+9+7F0V9o+20Pg=gpg@mail.gmail.com>
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.15
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.0.1353313685.29569.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 106
NNTP-Posting-Host 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace 1353313685 news.xs4all.nl 6859 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:38807
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:33535

Show key headers only | View raw


On 11/19/2012 1:01 AM, Ian Kelly wrote:

> than tuple access.  Tuples are as fast as or faster than lists, pretty
> much universally.  They seem to have closed the gap a bit in
> Python 3.3, though, as the following timings show.  For one-shot
> construction, tuples seem to be more efficient for short sequences,
> but then lists win for longer sequences, although not by much.  Of
> course, lists are always going to be much slower if you build them up
> with appends and extends.

Interesting results. But what system (hardware, os). These sorts of 
times tend to vary with the system.
>
> C:\>python -m timeit -s "x = range(10)" "tuple(x)"
> 1000000 loops, best of 3: 0.773 usec per loop
>
> C:\>python -m timeit -s "x = range(10)" "list(x)"
> 1000000 loops, best of 3: 0.879 usec per loop
>
> C:\>python -m timeit -s "x = range(100)" "tuple(x)"
> 100000 loops, best of 3: 2.88 usec per loop
>
> C:\>python -m timeit -s "x = range(100)" "list(x)"
> 100000 loops, best of 3: 2.63 usec per loop
>
> C:\>python -m timeit -s "x = range(1000)" "tuple(x)"
> 10000 loops, best of 3: 37.4 usec per loop
>
> C:\>python -m timeit -s "x = range(1000)" "list(x)"
> 10000 loops, best of 3: 36.2 usec per loop
>
> C:\>python -m timeit -s "x = range(10000)" "tuple(x)"
> 1000 loops, best of 3: 418 usec per loop
>
> C:\>python -m timeit -s "x = range(10000)" "list(x)"
> 1000 loops, best of 3: 410 usec per loop
>
>
> For iteration, tuples are consistently 7-8% faster.
>
>
> C:\>python -m timeit -s "x = tuple(range(10))" "for i in x: pass"
> 1000000 loops, best of 3: 0.467 usec per loop
>
> C:\>python -m timeit -s "x = list(range(10))" "for i in x: pass"
> 1000000 loops, best of 3: 0.498 usec per loop
>
> C:\>python -m timeit -s "x = tuple(range(100))" "for i in x: pass"
> 100000 loops, best of 3: 3.31 usec per loop
>
> C:\>python -m timeit -s "x = list(range(100))" "for i in x: pass"
> 100000 loops, best of 3: 3.56 usec per loop
>
> C:\>python -m timeit -s "x = tuple(range(1000))" "for i in x: pass"
> 10000 loops, best of 3: 31.6 usec per loop
>
> C:\>python -m timeit -s "x = list(range(1000))" "for i in x: pass"
> 10000 loops, best of 3: 34.3 usec per loop
>
> C:\>python -m timeit -s "x = tuple(range(10000))" "for i in x: pass"
> 1000 loops, best of 3: 318 usec per loop
>
> C:\>python -m timeit -s "x = list(range(10000))" "for i in x: pass"
> 1000 loops, best of 3: 341 usec per loop
>
>
> For direct item access, tuples seem to be about 2-3% faster.
>
>
> C:\>python -m timeit -s "import operator as o; x = tuple(range(10)); g
> = o.itemgetter(*range(len(x)))" "g(x)"
> 1000000 loops, best of 3: 0.67 usec per loop
>
> C:\>python -m timeit -s "import operator as o; x = list(range(10)); g
> = o.itemgetter(*range(len(x)))" "g(x)"
> 1000000 loops, best of 3: 0.674 usec per loop
>
> C:\>python -m timeit -s "import operator as o; x = tuple(range(100));
> g = o.itemgetter(*range(len(x)))" "g(x)"
> 100000 loops, best of 3: 4.52 usec per loop
>
> C:\>python -m timeit -s "import operator as o; x = list(range(100)); g
> = o.itemgetter(*range(len(x)))" "g(x)"
> 100000 loops, best of 3: 4.65 usec per loop
>
> C:\>python -m timeit -s "import operator as o; x = tuple(range(1000));
> g = o.itemgetter(*range(len(x)))" "g(x)"
> 10000 loops, best of 3: 43.2 usec per loop
>
> C:\>python -m timeit -s "import operator as o; x = list(range(1000));
> g = o.itemgetter(*range(len(x)))" "g(x)"
> 10000 loops, best of 3: 43.7 usec per loop
>
> C:\>python -m timeit -s "import operator as o; x =
> tuple(range(10000)); g = o.itemgetter(*range(len(x)))" "g(x)"
> 1000 loops, best of 3: 422 usec per loop
>
> C:\>python -m timeit -s "import operator as o; x = list(range(10000));
> g = o.itemgetter(*range(len(x)))" "g(x)"
> 1000 loops, best of 3: 447 usec per loop
>


-- 
Terry Jan Reedy

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: Python Interview Questions chinjannisha@gmail.com - 2012-11-17 10:01 -0800
  Re: Python Interview Questions Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2012-11-18 01:54 -0500
  Re: Python Interview Questions Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-11-18 09:39 +0000
    Re: Python Interview Questions Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2012-11-18 08:53 -0500
      Re: Python Interview Questions Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-11-18 16:50 +0000
        Re: Python Interview Questions "D'Arcy J.M. Cain" <darcy@druid.net> - 2012-11-18 12:16 -0500
        Re: Python Interview Questions Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2012-11-18 12:53 -0500
          Re: Python Interview Questions Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-11-19 00:31 +0000
            Re: Python Interview Questions Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2012-11-18 21:09 -0500
              Re: Python Interview Questions Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-11-19 13:18 +1100
              Re: Python Interview Questions Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-11-19 02:42 +0000
              Re: Python Interview Questions Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-11-18 23:01 -0700
              Re: Python Interview Questions Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-11-19 07:54 +0000
                Re: Python Interview Questions Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2012-11-19 09:30 -0500
                Re: Python Interview Questions Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-11-19 09:44 -0700
                Re: Python Interview Questions Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2012-11-19 15:41 -0500
                Re: Python Interview Questions Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-11-19 23:42 +0000
                Re: Python Interview Questions Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2012-11-19 21:33 -0500
                Re: Python Interview Questions Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2012-11-19 09:59 -0500
                Re: Python Interview Questions Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-11-19 23:53 +0000
                Re: Python Interview Questions Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2012-11-19 22:14 -0500
                RE: Python Interview Questions "Prasad, Ramit" <ramit.prasad@jpmorgan.com> - 2012-11-19 23:57 +0000
              Re: Python Interview Questions Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2012-11-19 03:27 -0500
        Re: Python Interview Questions Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-11-19 07:02 +1100

csiph-web