Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #21559
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.lisp, comp.lang.python |
|---|---|
| From | Albert van der Horst <albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> |
| Subject | Re: are int, float, long, double, side-effects of computer engineering? |
| Date | 2012-03-13 10:40 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <m0tkbh.7cb@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> (permalink) |
| Organization | Dutch Forth Workshop |
| References | <5aaded58-af09-41dc-9afd-56d7b7ced239@d7g2000pbl.googlegroups.com> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
In article <5aaded58-af09-41dc-9afd-56d7b7ced239@d7g2000pbl.googlegroups.com>, Xah Lee <xahlee@gmail.com> wrote: <SNIP> > >what i meant to point out is that Mathematica deals with numbers at a >high-level human way. That is, one doesn't think in terms of float, >long, int, double. These words are never mentioned. Instead, you have >concepts of machine precision, accuracy. The lang automatically handle >the translation to hardware, and invoking exact value or infinite >precision as required or requested. With e.g. a vanderMonde matrix you can easily make Mathematica fail. If you don't understand what a condition number is, you can't use Mathematica. And yes condition numbers are fully in the realm of concepts of machine precisions and accuracy. Infinite precision takes infinite time. Approaching infinite precious may take exponentional time. > > Xah Groetjes Albert -- -- Albert van der Horst, UTRECHT,THE NETHERLANDS Economic growth -- being exponential -- ultimately falters. albert@spe&ar&c.xs4all.nl &=n http://home.hccnet.nl/a.w.m.van.der.horst
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
are int, float, long, double, side-effects of computer engineering? Xah Lee <xahlee@gmail.com> - 2012-03-05 17:11 -0800
Re: are int, float, long, double, side-effects of computer engineering? Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-03-06 02:14 +0000
Re: are int, float, long, double, side-effects of computer engineering? Westley Martínez <anikom15@gmail.com> - 2012-03-05 19:17 -0800
Re: are int, float, long, double, side-effects of computer engineering? Tim Roberts <timr@probo.com> - 2012-03-05 21:26 -0800
Re: are int, float, long, double, side-effects of computer engineering? Xah Lee <xahlee@gmail.com> - 2012-03-05 22:34 -0800
Re: are int, float, long, double, side-effects of computer engineering? "Russ P." <russ.paielli@gmail.com> - 2012-03-06 00:02 -0800
Re: are int, float, long, double, side-effects of computer engineering? Chiron <chiron613.no.spam.@no.spam.please.gmail.com> - 2012-03-06 10:10 +0000
Re: are int, float, long, double, side-effects of computer engineering? Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2012-03-06 08:49 -0500
Re: are int, float, long, double, side-effects of computer engineering? Calvin Kim <reader@calvinkim.org> - 2012-03-06 16:29 -0500
Re: are int, float, long, double, side-effects of computer engineering? Westley Martínez <anikom15@gmail.com> - 2012-03-06 16:53 -0800
Re: are int, float, long, double, side-effects of computer engineering? Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2012-03-06 21:51 -0500
RE: are int, float, long, double, side-effects of computer engineering? "Prasad, Ramit" <ramit.prasad@jpmorgan.com> - 2012-03-07 19:05 +0000
Re: are int, float, long, double, side-effects of computer engineering? Chiron <chiron613.no.spam.@no.spam.please.gmail.com> - 2012-03-06 10:00 +0000
Re: are int, float, long, double, side-effects of computer engineering? rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2012-03-06 19:25 -0800
Re: are int, float, long, double, side-effects of computer engineering? "Russ P." <russ.paielli@gmail.com> - 2012-03-07 14:02 -0800
Re: are int, float, long, double, side-effects of computer engineering? John Nagle <nagle@animats.com> - 2012-03-13 22:32 -0700
Re: are int, float, long, double, side-effects of computer engineering? Albert van der Horst <albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> - 2012-03-13 10:40 +0000
csiph-web