Re: More Pythonic implementation

Path	csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!enother.net!enother.net!gegeweb.org!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!news.tota-refugium.de!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From	Thomas Rachel <nutznetz-0c1b6768-bfa9-48d5-a470-7603bd3aa915@spamschutz.glglgl.de>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Subject	Re: More Pythonic implementation
Date	Wed, 20 Aug 2014 17:52:14 +0200
Organization	A not so newly installed InterNetNews server
Lines	42
Message-ID	<lt2g7j$c3t$1@r01.glglgl.de> (permalink)
References	<mailman.13161.1408473590.18130.python-list@python.org>
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
X-Trace	tota-refugium.de 1408550404 27948 eJwNzLcRwEAIAMGW8DzlYPsvQYou2TllQ2sXUxM9PYKd/ZvMqeDvgtvRvEhiuFTDnzAyJMveAMygkOHWoK1PNwem1i8xSjiG/ku+w07qBx+AYh3l (20 Aug 2014 16:00:04 GMT)
X-Complaints-To	abuse@news.tota-refugium.de
NNTP-Posting-Date	Wed, 20 Aug 2014 16:00:04 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 Hamster/2.1.0.11
X-User-ID	eJwFwYkBgDAIA8CVJCY842CF/UfonV43P0GXU6tNVEjFetDwzzg9MYXjsB0acmr5Y9tU2bwDLRCE
In-Reply-To	<mailman.13161.1408473590.18130.python-list@python.org>
Cancel-Lock	sha1:dregspDTzsmJaJm5AU+ETkujBSI=
X-NNTP-Posting-Host	eJwFwQcBwEAIBDBLjAMeOZThX0ITU2fvgJvDzi7XAsQcSppttz4PAfbjK+SBDiKpu7rhmKByqbetwtC2TNwq5RDq4pvrVyEdX3QPV/1SUR4w
Xref	csiph.com comp.lang.python:76672

Show key headers only | View raw

Am 19.08.2014 19:09 schrieb Shubham Tomar:

> Lets say I have a function poker(hands) that takes a list of hands and
> returns the highest ranking hand, and another function hand_rank(hand)
> that takes hand and return its rank. As in Poker
> http://www.pokerstars.com/poker/games/rules/hand-rankings/.
>
> Which of the following is better and more Pythonic ?

They are different.


> def poker(hands):
>      return max(hands, key=hand_rank)

This one determines the hands element with the biggest hand_rank(i) 
value and returns it, while

> def poker(hands):
>      return max(hand_rank(hands))

returns the hand_rank value, but only if hand_rank() is applicable to 
lists. Otherwise, it fails.


hands = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

def hand_rank(i): return -i

So,

max(hands, key=hand_rank)

gives 1 because it has the biggest hand_rank(value) of -1 in the range 
of -5..-1.

OTOH,

max(hand_rank(hands))

will fail, because there is no list.__neg__(). If there was, it would be 
the same as max([-1, -2, -3, -4, -5]), so it would be -1 itself.

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

More Pythonic implementation Shubham Tomar <tomarshubham24@gmail.com> - 2014-08-19 22:39 +0530
  Re: More Pythonic implementation Thomas Rachel <nutznetz-0c1b6768-bfa9-48d5-a470-7603bd3aa915@spamschutz.glglgl.de> - 2014-08-20 17:52 +0200

csiph-web