Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #39325
| Path | csiph.com!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder3.hal-mli.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder2.hal-mli.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx05.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Subject | Re: Is Python "venerable"? |
| Date | Wed, 20 Feb 2013 09:08:35 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Lines | 23 |
| Message-ID | <kg23os$3sm$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <roy-198D2A.21455319022013@news.panix.com> <23c59846-5eff-4f7c-8868-965967dd0ac3@i5g2000pbj.googlegroups.com> |
| Reply-To | rui.maciel@gmail.com |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7Bit |
| Injection-Date | Wed, 20 Feb 2013 09:07:40 +0000 (UTC) |
| Injection-Info | mx05.eternal-september.org; posting-host="f9db22b05a10709939588f9f492c811f"; logging-data="3990"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18AIFrW6yiAHwFkB+UXfrZ+TdQtQqj5oy8=" |
| User-Agent | KNode/4.8.5 |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:4C5l+Hd9I5x9/hfwdR2RiIq56oQ= |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.python:39325 |
Show key headers only | View raw
rusi wrote: > Heh! I am reminded: > Some years ago a new reprint of Knuth's Art of Programming had on the > back cover something to the effect that this was 'classical CS.' > > So what then is pop-CS, folk-CS? Knuth's work is undoubtedly classic. Classic: 1. of the first or highest quality, class, or rank: a classic piece of work. 2. serving as a standard, model, or guide: the classic method of teaching arithmetic. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/classic Rui Maciel
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Is Python "venerable"? Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-02-19 21:45 -0500
Re: Is Python "venerable"? MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2013-02-20 03:09 +0000
Re: Is Python "venerable"? Barry W Brown <brownbar@gmail.com> - 2013-02-19 19:53 -0800
Re: Is Python "venerable"? Rotwang <sg552@hotmail.co.uk> - 2013-02-20 16:03 +0000
Re: Is Python "venerable"? Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2013-02-19 23:03 -0500
Re: Is Python "venerable"? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-02-20 04:15 +0000
Re: Is Python "venerable"? rh <richard_hubbe11@lavabit.com> - 2013-02-20 11:28 -0800
Re: Is Python "venerable"? Gene Heskett <gheskett@wdtv.com> - 2013-02-19 23:10 -0500
Re: Is Python "venerable"? rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2013-02-19 20:42 -0800
Re: Is Python "venerable"? Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2013-02-20 09:08 +0000
Re: Is Python "venerable"? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-02-20 20:20 +1100
Re: Is Python "venerable"? rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2013-02-20 02:49 -0800
Re: Is Python "venerable"? Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2013-02-20 10:19 +0100
Re: Is Python "venerable"? Albert Hopkins <marduk@letterboxes.org> - 2013-02-20 06:03 -0500
Re: Is Python "venerable"? Steve Simmons <square.steve@gmail.com> - 2013-02-20 12:35 +0100
Re: Is Python "venerable"? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-02-20 22:45 +1100
Re: Is Python "venerable"? rh <richard_hubbe11@lavabit.com> - 2013-02-20 11:29 -0800
Re: Is Python "venerable"? Gene Heskett <gheskett@wdtv.com> - 2013-02-20 10:33 -0500
csiph-web