Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #32411

Re: Nice solution wanted: Hide internal interfaces

Path csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!news.glorb.com!news-out.readnews.com!transit4.readnews.com!panix!not-for-mail
From Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Subject Re: Nice solution wanted: Hide internal interfaces
Date Mon, 29 Oct 2012 18:00:58 +0000 (UTC)
Organization PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC
Lines 22
Message-ID <k6mg8q$sen$1@reader1.panix.com> (permalink)
References <k6mb4k$5v3$1@news.albasani.net> <mailman.3030.1351529244.27098.python-list@python.org> <k6mcjm$99m$1@news.albasani.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host dsl.comtrol.com
X-Trace reader1.panix.com 1351533658 29143 64.122.56.22 (29 Oct 2012 18:00:58 GMT)
X-Complaints-To abuse@panix.com
NNTP-Posting-Date Mon, 29 Oct 2012 18:00:58 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent slrn/pre1.0.0-18 (Linux)
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:32411

Show key headers only | View raw


On 2012-10-29, Johannes Bauer <dfnsonfsduifb@gmx.de> wrote:
> On 29.10.2012 17:47, Chris Angelico wrote:
>
>> The usual convention for private methods is a leading underscore on the name:
>
> Yup, that's what I'm using.
>
>> It's only a convention, though; it doesn't make it "hard" to call
>> them, it just sends the message "this is private, I don't promise that
>> it'll be stable across versions".
>
> Yes, I know. But it's good enough. I don't want to restrict the use
> under all circumstances, just make it clear to the user what she is
> supposed to use and what not.

The single underscore indicates that the user is not to use the
method.

-- 
Grant Edwards               grant.b.edwards        Yow! I am covered with
                                  at               pure vegetable oil and I am
                              gmail.com            writing a best seller!

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Nice solution wanted: Hide internal interfaces Johannes Bauer <dfnsonfsduifb@gmx.de> - 2012-10-29 17:33 +0100
  Re: Nice solution wanted: Hide internal interfaces andrea crotti <andrea.crotti.0@gmail.com> - 2012-10-29 16:41 +0000
  Re: Nice solution wanted: Hide internal interfaces Benjamin Kaplan <benjamin.kaplan@case.edu> - 2012-10-29 09:41 -0700
  Re: Nice solution wanted: Hide internal interfaces Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-10-30 03:47 +1100
    Re: Nice solution wanted: Hide internal interfaces Johannes Bauer <dfnsonfsduifb@gmx.de> - 2012-10-29 17:58 +0100
      Re: Nice solution wanted: Hide internal interfaces Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-10-29 10:03 -0700
      Re: Nice solution wanted: Hide internal interfaces Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2012-10-29 18:00 +0000
      Re: Nice solution wanted: Hide internal interfaces Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-10-29 13:09 -0600
  Re: Nice solution wanted: Hide internal interfaces Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2012-10-29 16:52 +0000
    Re: Nice solution wanted: Hide internal interfaces Johannes Bauer <dfnsonfsduifb@gmx.de> - 2012-10-29 18:01 +0100
      Re: Nice solution wanted: Hide internal interfaces Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2012-10-29 18:17 +0100
  Re: Nice solution wanted: Hide internal interfaces Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2012-10-29 18:06 +0100
  Re: Nice solution wanted: Hide internal interfaces Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-10-29 22:37 +0000
  Re: Nice solution wanted: Hide internal interfaces alex23 <wuwei23@gmail.com> - 2012-10-29 18:37 -0700
    Re: Nice solution wanted: Hide internal interfaces andrea crotti <andrea.crotti.0@gmail.com> - 2012-10-30 14:15 +0000

csiph-web