Re: How good is security via hashing

From	Thomas Rachel <nutznetz-0c1b6768-bfa9-48d5-a470-7603bd3aa915@spamschutz.glglgl.de>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Subject	Re: How good is security via hashing
Date	2011-06-08 13:30 +0200
Organization	A newly installed InterNetNews server
Message-ID	<isnmgv$q2s$1@r03.glglgl.eu> (permalink)
References	<4DEDFAEB.4050006@chamonix.reportlab.co.uk> <mailman.2542.1307476969.9059.python-list@python.org> <7xfwnl1ihk.fsf@ruckus.brouhaha.com> <mailman.23.1307524422.11593.python-list@python.org>

Show all headers | View raw

Am 08.06.2011 11:13 schrieb Robin Becker:

> we have been using base62 ie 0-9A-Za-z just to reduce the name length.

Ugly concerning calculation. Then maybe better use radix32 - 0..9a..v, 
case-insensitive.


Thomas

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: How good is security via hashing geremy condra <debatem1@gmail.com> - 2011-06-07 13:02 -0700
  Re: How good is security via hashing Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-07 13:42 -0700
    Re: How good is security via hashing Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2011-06-07 14:58 -0600
    Re: How good is security via hashing geremy condra <debatem1@gmail.com> - 2011-06-07 14:41 -0700
    Re: How good is security via hashing Robin Becker <robin@reportlab.com> - 2011-06-08 10:13 +0100
      Re: How good is security via hashing Thomas Rachel <nutznetz-0c1b6768-bfa9-48d5-a470-7603bd3aa915@spamschutz.glglgl.de> - 2011-06-08 13:30 +0200

csiph-web