Re: setup failed

Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Date	2016-02-08 03:02 -0800
References	<mailman.57.1454590154.30993.python-list@python.org> <7f3af18b-fcad-4da5-8b01-231c4c33bcc4@googlegroups.com>
Message-ID	<f7e67f01-300a-4c13-8348-9e20e12c0345@googlegroups.com> (permalink)
Subject	Re: setup failed
From	Mark Summerfield <list@qtrac.plus.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On Monday, February 8, 2016 at 10:50:19 AM UTC, Mark Summerfield wrote:
> If you need 32-bit Python on Windows my advice is to install 3.4. If you need 32-bit and 64-bit Python on Windows, then I think it will only work with 3.4 (or older), but not with 3.5's new installer.
> 
> I have tried installing 3.5.0 and 3.5.1 on several machines both 32- and 64-bit Windows. The 32-bit installer either doesn't work at all or won't work with two third-party packages I use: APSW and PyWin32. The 64-bit installer does seem to work on 64-bit machines, but in my particular case I need both 32- and 64-bit versions so use Python 3.4. Hopefully the problem will be fixed before 3.4's end of life:-)

Ooops, of course you're already using the 64-bit installer. My advice is use Python 3.4 if you need to work on Windows: unlike the 3.5 installer I've never encountered a problem with the 3.4 (or 3.3) installers.

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

setup failed Prince Thomas <prince100thomas@outlook.com> - 2016-02-04 12:39 +0000
  Re: setup failed Quivis <quivis@domain.invalid> - 2016-02-06 15:00 +0000
  Re: setup failed Mike S <mscir@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-08 00:27 -0800
  Re: setup failed Mark Summerfield <list@qtrac.plus.com> - 2016-02-08 02:50 -0800
    Re: setup failed Mark Summerfield <list@qtrac.plus.com> - 2016-02-08 03:02 -0800

csiph-web