Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #56581
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-10-10 07:52 -0700 |
| References | <CAPTjJmrGrS6A50nV98vttQ2hv6avWewao3FQX81sej7S-Ottfw@mail.gmail.com> <mailman.946.1381415643.18130.python-list@python.org> |
| Message-ID | <eea3239c-e480-4b88-9bd9-5281f0e9e4fa@googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| Subject | Re: Complex literals (was Re: I am never going to complain about Python again) |
| From | rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> |
On Thursday, October 10, 2013 8:04:00 PM UTC+5:30, David wrote: > I have never heard the term "hypercomplex" numbers. I guess you > are referring to vectors with more dimensions than two. A three A generalization of quaternions : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypercomplex_number http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quaternion And now where's the policeman out to catch the OT threads?? [Ducks the eggs and runs...]
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Complex literals (was Re: I am never going to complain about Python again) David <bouncingcats@gmail.com> - 2013-10-11 01:34 +1100
Re: Complex literals (was Re: I am never going to complain about Python again) rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2013-10-10 07:52 -0700
Re: Complex literals (was Re: I am never going to complain about Python again) Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2013-10-10 20:16 -0400
csiph-web