Re: generators as decorators simple issue

Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Date	2012-09-12 04:15 -0700
References	<e738542a-f864-4ad0-9aaa-738047356841@googlegroups.com>
Message-ID	<eb154bbe-8836-431f-831e-8763544b1c54@googlegroups.com> (permalink)
Subject	Re: generators as decorators simple issue
From	pyjoshsys <j.m.dagenhart@gmail.com>

Show all headers | View raw

so decorators only pass the object and not any instance of the object as the implied argument? Is this right?

The idea was to use @setname instead of instance.SetName(instance.__name__).

I thought decorators would do this, but it seems not.

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

generators as decorators simple issue j.m.dagenhart@gmail.com - 2012-09-11 19:28 -0700
  Re: generators as decorators simple issue Ramchandra Apte <maniandram01@gmail.com> - 2012-09-11 19:55 -0700
  Re: generators as decorators simple issue alex23 <wuwei23@gmail.com> - 2012-09-11 21:39 -0700
  Re: generators as decorators simple issue Thomas Rachel <nutznetz-0c1b6768-bfa9-48d5-a470-7603bd3aa915@spamschutz.glglgl.de> - 2012-09-12 08:08 +0200
  Re: generators as decorators simple issue pyjoshsys <j.m.dagenhart@gmail.com> - 2012-09-12 03:22 -0700
    Re: generators as decorators simple issue Oscar Benjamin <oscar.j.benjamin@gmail.com> - 2012-09-12 11:47 +0100
    Re: generators as decorators simple issue Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-09-12 09:09 -0600
  Re: generators as decorators simple issue pyjoshsys <j.m.dagenhart@gmail.com> - 2012-09-12 04:15 -0700

csiph-web