Re: Multiprocessing, shared memory vs. pickled copies

Path	csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!l39g2000yqh.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From	sturlamolden <sturlamolden@yahoo.no>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Subject	Re: Multiprocessing, shared memory vs. pickled copies
Date	Thu, 7 Apr 2011 18:10:25 -0700 (PDT)
Organization	http://groups.google.com
Lines	14
Message-ID	<eb095741-dc46-412c-ae63-1bb2ea8b60e1@l39g2000yqh.googlegroups.com> (permalink)
References	<6ace38dc-33c6-44ab-a17a-084d62d666cb@w9g2000prg.googlegroups.com> <da43ed0c-88a1-44e0-ad95-2bdc0d4872c7@1g2000yqq.googlegroups.com> <dfd78a71-a4d9-4f5d-a292-72e4d843a396@p13g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host	178.232.183.232
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Trace	posting.google.com 1302225025 11759 127.0.0.1 (8 Apr 2011 01:10:25 GMT)
X-Complaints-To	groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date	Fri, 8 Apr 2011 01:10:25 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To	groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info	l39g2000yqh.googlegroups.com; posting-host=178.232.183.232; posting-account=jLVA4AoAAACnFl2D2gz1qNYFxA8AUnMb
User-Agent	G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; nb-NO; rv:1.9.1.18) Gecko/20110319 Firefox/3.5.18,gzip(gfe)
Xref	x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:2821

Show key headers only | View raw

On 8 apr, 02:38, sturlamolden <sturlamol...@yahoo.no> wrote:

> I should probably fix it for 64-bit now. Just recompiliong with 64-bit
> integers will not work, because I intentionally hardcoded the higher
> 32 bits to 0.

That was easy, 64-bit support for Windows is done :-)

Now I'll just have to fix the Linux code, and figure out what to do
with os._exit preventing clean-up on exit... :-(

Sturla

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Multiprocessing, shared memory vs. pickled copies John Ladasky <ladasky@my-deja.com> - 2011-04-04 13:20 -0700
  Re: Multiprocessing, shared memory vs. pickled copies Philip Semanchuk <philip@semanchuk.com> - 2011-04-04 19:34 -0400
    Re: Multiprocessing, shared memory vs. pickled copies John Ladasky <ladasky@my-deja.com> - 2011-04-05 09:58 -0700
      Re: Multiprocessing, shared memory vs. pickled copies Philip Semanchuk <philip@semanchuk.com> - 2011-04-05 13:43 -0400
        Re: Multiprocessing, shared memory vs. pickled copies John Ladasky <ladasky@my-deja.com> - 2011-04-06 23:40 -0700
          Re: Multiprocessing, shared memory vs. pickled copies John Ladasky <ladasky@my-deja.com> - 2011-04-07 00:41 -0700
            Re: Multiprocessing, shared memory vs. pickled copies Philip Semanchuk <philip@semanchuk.com> - 2011-04-07 09:23 -0400
          Re: Multiprocessing, shared memory vs. pickled copies Robert Kern <robert.kern@gmail.com> - 2011-04-07 12:44 -0500
            Re: Multiprocessing, shared memory vs. pickled copies John Ladasky <ladasky@my-deja.com> - 2011-04-07 11:39 -0700
              Re: Multiprocessing, shared memory vs. pickled copies Robert Kern <robert.kern@gmail.com> - 2011-04-07 15:01 -0500
  Re: Multiprocessing, shared memory vs. pickled copies Robert Kern <robert.kern@gmail.com> - 2011-04-04 19:05 -0500
    Re: Multiprocessing, shared memory vs. pickled copies sturlamolden <sturlamolden@yahoo.no> - 2011-04-07 16:39 -0700
  Re: Multiprocessing, shared memory vs. pickled copies Philip Semanchuk <philip@semanchuk.com> - 2011-04-04 21:16 -0400
  Re: Multiprocessing, shared memory vs. pickled copies Robert Kern <robert.kern@gmail.com> - 2011-04-05 10:47 -0500
  Re: Multiprocessing, shared memory vs. pickled copies sturlamolden <sturlamolden@yahoo.no> - 2011-04-07 17:03 -0700
    Re: Multiprocessing, shared memory vs. pickled copies sturlamolden <sturlamolden@yahoo.no> - 2011-04-07 17:38 -0700
      Re: Multiprocessing, shared memory vs. pickled copies sturlamolden <sturlamolden@yahoo.no> - 2011-04-07 18:10 -0700
        Re: Multiprocessing, shared memory vs. pickled copies John Ladasky <ladasky@my-deja.com> - 2011-04-09 00:36 -0700
          Re: Multiprocessing, shared memory vs. pickled copies sturlamolden <sturlamolden@yahoo.no> - 2011-04-09 10:15 -0700
            Re: Multiprocessing, shared memory vs. pickled copies John Ladasky <ladasky@my-deja.com> - 2011-04-09 13:18 -0700
              Re: Multiprocessing, shared memory vs. pickled copies sturlamolden <sturlamolden@yahoo.no> - 2011-04-10 08:01 -0700
        Re: Multiprocessing, shared memory vs. pickled copies sturlamolden <sturlamolden@yahoo.no> - 2011-04-10 15:35 -0700

csiph-web