Groups > comp.lang.python > #197739

Re: Python linuxfs Modules

Path	csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!news.nntp4.net!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From	Oguz Kaan Ocal <oguzkaanocal3169@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Subject	Re: Python linuxfs Modules
Date	Tue, 17 Mar 2026 14:30:42 +0300
Message-ID	<c51f175a-5e17-8e2e-d50b-128f148a036d@hotmail.com> (permalink)
References	<10pask7$2m01c$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding	8bit
X-Trace	eJzLSy0v1svLKykw0ctLLbHm4szJT0/PzEvXTUksSbRVMjQzNjQ0NFKyVshNzMzRTc7PLchJzMwrKdYtybdVSkwqLU51gOtWUtBXAAA3SBpP
User-Agent	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.15.1
To	Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid>
Cancel-Lock	sha1:tdarvXmyxfYxbiDsl/zyg8f3bzs= sha256:cDSiNZzgUh8oxYXboLy5dzC0y/GIHItLytVgzG5uH5o=
In-Reply-To	<10pask7$2m01c$1@dont-email.me>
X-Abuse-Contact	"Web: https://news.nntp4.net/abuse.php / Mail: abuse@nntp4.net"
Xref	csiph.com comp.lang.python:197739

Show key headers only | View raw

On 17.03.2026 09:33, Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote:
> python_linuxfs <https://gitlab.com/ldo/python_linuxfs> is a set of
> Python modules providing higher-level wrappers around various
> Linux-specific system APIs. Some of these already have support in the
> “os” module in the standard Python library, but most don’t. Even for
> the ones that do, I think my wrappers are nicer to use, because they
> avoid the requirement for working with bitmasks and use sets of
> symbolic bit enums instead (with easy conversions between both forms).
> 
> The package is split into five modules:
> 
>    * linuxfs -- file/directory functions and common utilities used by
>      other modules
>    * linuxacl -- access-control-list functions
>    * linuxmount -- enhanced Linux mount API
>    * linuxpriv -- privilege control, i.e. the Linux landlock API
>    * linuxproc -- process control: prctl (selected), pidfd,
>      signalfd and signal mask sets, namespaces
Interesting approach. Regarding the linuxacl and linuxmount modules: how 
do you handle compatibility across different kernel versions? Since some 
of these APIs (like Landlock or newer mount features) are relatively 
recent, does the library provide graceful fallbacks or just raise 
NotImplementedError?

Using sets of enums instead of bitmasks is definitely 'The Pythonic 
Way'. It makes the code much more self-documenting.

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Python linuxfs Modules Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-03-17 06:33 +0000
  Re: Python linuxfs Modules Oguz Kaan Ocal <oguzkaanocal3169@hotmail.com> - 2026-03-17 14:30 +0300
    Re: Python linuxfs Modules Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-03-17 21:26 +0000
      Re: Python linuxfs Modules Oguz Kaan Ocal <oguzkaanocal3169@hotmail.com> - 2026-03-22 14:14 +0300
  Re: Python linuxfs Modules Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2026-03-17 23:28 -0700
    Re: Python linuxfs Modules Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-03-18 08:04 +0000
      Re: Python linuxfs Modules Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-03-21 23:10 +0000
  Re: Python linuxfs Modules DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2026-04-08 12:26 -0400

csiph-web