Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #68241
| From | Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Subject | Re: which async framework? |
| Date | 2014-03-12 10:56 +1300 |
| Message-ID | <bo9f4lFacnnU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <531E22DF.7030709@simplistix.co.uk> <1733040935416225908.878896sturla.molden-gmail.com@news.gmane.org> <loom.20140311T170030-477@post.gmane.org> <mailman.8055.1394559893.18130.python-list@python.org> |
Sturla Molden wrote: > Another thing is that co-routines and "yield from" statements just makes it > hard to follow the logic of the program. I still have to convince myself > that a library for transforming epoll function calls into co-routines is > actually useful. It's not "epoll function calls" that the coroutine style is intended to replace, it's complex systems of chained callbacks. They're supposed to make that kind of logic *easier* to follow. If you haven't had that experience, it may be because you've only dealt with simple cases. -- Greg
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: which async framework? Sturla Molden <sturla.molden@gmail.com> - 2014-03-11 17:44 +0000
Re: which async framework? Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2014-03-12 10:56 +1300
Re: which async framework? Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-03-12 00:18 +0200
csiph-web