Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #62294
| From | Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Subject | Re: Type of an object: |
| Date | 2013-12-19 00:45 +1300 |
| Message-ID | <bhdg62Fjrb3U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <bhann0F1rrsU1@mid.individual.net> <52b06902$0$29976$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <bhc0n9Fan00U1@mid.individual.net> <52b0e36b$0$6512$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <mailman.4316.1387330505.18130.python-list@python.org> |
Ethan Furman wrote: >> This leads to another question: we've now seen two examples where >> (presumably) the internal type field and __class__ differ. In the >> weakproxy case, type(obj) returns the internal type field. In the >> "regular" case, where you set obj.__class__ to a class, type(obj) returns >> the new (external) type. How the hell does it decide which one to return? When you set the __class__ of a regular object and it succeeds, it actually changes the internal type, i.e. obj->ob_type at the C level. This is only allowed under certain conditions. Mostly only for user-defined classes, and only if the layouts of the old and new instance structs are compatible. -- Greg
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Type of an object: ‘obj.__class__’ versus ‘type(obj)’ Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2013-12-16 12:51 +1100
Re: Type of an object: ‘obj.__class__’ versus ‘type(obj)’ Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-12-16 22:17 +0000
Re: Type of an object: ‘obj.__class__’ versus ‘type(obj)’ dieter <dieter@handshake.de> - 2013-12-17 08:14 +0100
Re: Type of an object: ‘obj.__class__’ versus ‘type(obj)’ Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2013-12-17 07:42 +0000
Re: Type of an object: Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2013-12-17 23:35 +1300
Re: Type of an object: Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2013-12-17 06:50 -0800
Re: Type of an object: Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-12-17 15:08 +0000
Re: Type of an object: Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2013-12-18 11:15 +1300
Re: Type of an object: Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-12-17 23:51 +0000
Re: Type of an object: Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2013-12-17 17:10 -0800
Re: Type of an object: Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2013-12-19 00:45 +1300
Re: Type of an object: Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2013-12-19 00:39 +1300
csiph-web