Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #47802

Re: py_compile vs. built-in compile, with __future__

Path csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!news.swapon.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From Neil Cerutti <neilc@norwich.edu>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Subject Re: py_compile vs. built-in compile, with __future__
Date 12 Jun 2013 13:30:43 GMT
Organization Norwich University
Lines 10
Message-ID <b1rbg3Fmmi9U2@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References <0bfe7bee-3df2-4fb8-8aad-c2124792b8b6@googlegroups.com> <mailman.2987.1370897988.3114.python-list@python.org> <a0902635-60ca-4c93-a296-88f1740ac8fe@googlegroups.com> <mailman.2990.1370903766.3114.python-list@python.org> <e0a8943b-d851-491d-ad88-5fe1c7241e09@googlegroups.com> <b1ouhdF70r8U1@mid.individual.net> <3391a098-22e1-4d8b-a360-939fb4e77b74@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Trace individual.net fDRcSW4FnU07uefsuDKo7A9y4Ksqhn9KLkmCHaQKtuayWAan69
Cancel-Lock sha1:6oFedhuer1ymSJA1BAAvskIxTBk=
User-Agent slrn/0.9.9p1/mm/ao (Win32)
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:47802

Show key headers only | View raw


On 2013-06-11, dhyams <dhyams@gmail.com> wrote:
>> You would use StringIO instead of writing a temp file.
>
> I don't think that would work...py_compile takes a filename as
> input, not a file object.

Dang. Sorry for the misinfo.

-- 
Neil Cerutti

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

py_compile vs. built-in compile, with __future__ dhyams <dhyams@gmail.com> - 2013-06-10 08:33 -0700
  Re: py_compile vs. built-in compile, with __future__ Terry Jan Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2013-06-10 16:59 -0400
    Re: py_compile vs. built-in compile, with __future__ dhyams <dhyams@gmail.com> - 2013-06-10 15:27 -0700
      Re: py_compile vs. built-in compile, with __future__ Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-06-11 08:36 +1000
        Re: py_compile vs. built-in compile, with __future__ dhyams <dhyams@gmail.com> - 2013-06-10 16:31 -0700
          Re: py_compile vs. built-in compile, with __future__ Neil Cerutti <neilc@norwich.edu> - 2013-06-11 15:37 +0000
            Re: py_compile vs. built-in compile, with __future__ dhyams <dhyams@gmail.com> - 2013-06-11 14:25 -0700
              Re: py_compile vs. built-in compile, with __future__ Neil Cerutti <neilc@norwich.edu> - 2013-06-12 13:30 +0000

csiph-web