Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #31367
| From | Duncan Booth <duncan.booth@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Subject | Re: portable unicode literals |
| Date | 2012-10-16 08:44 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <XnsA0EE620C017FFduncanbooth@127.0.0.1> (permalink) |
| References | <t8etk9-5h9.ln1@satorlaser.homedns.org> <mailman.2204.1350308926.27098.python-list@python.org> |
Alex Strickland <sscc@mweb.co.za> wrote: > On 2012/10/15 03:05 PM, Ulrich Eckhardt wrote: > >> This actually came as a surprise to me, I assumed that using b'' I could >> portably create a byte string (which is true) and using u'' I could >> portably create a unicode string (which is not true). This feature would >> help porting code between both versions. While this is a state I can >> live with, I wonder what the rationale for this is. >> >> !puzzled thanks > > u'' is legal in 3.3 again. > and if you want it to work in 3.1 and 3.2 there is the uprefix import hook: https://bitbucket.org/vinay.sajip/uprefix -- Duncan Booth http://kupuguy.blogspot.com
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
portable unicode literals Ulrich Eckhardt <ulrich.eckhardt@dominolaser.com> - 2012-10-15 15:05 +0200
Re: portable unicode literals Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-10-15 13:26 +0000
Re: portable unicode literals Dave Angel <d@davea.name> - 2012-10-15 09:32 -0400
Re: portable unicode literals Alex Strickland <sscc@mweb.co.za> - 2012-10-15 15:41 +0200
Re: portable unicode literals Duncan Booth <duncan.booth@invalid.invalid> - 2012-10-16 08:44 +0000
Re: portable unicode literals Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka@gmail.com> - 2012-10-15 20:11 +0300
csiph-web