Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #13264
| From | Duncan Booth <duncan.booth@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Subject | Re: stackoverflow and c.l.py (was: GIL switch interval) |
| Date | 2011-09-14 08:24 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <Xns9F605E618E6B1duncanbooth@127.0.0.1> (permalink) |
| References | <CAB4yi1Nc04-6zw98WW+rss9u80amNbmk7GpMw-b0uHDdiRgC7w@mail.gmail.com> <mailman.1100.1315973589.27778.python-list@python.org> |
Stefan Behnel <stefan_ml@behnel.de> wrote: > Matt Joiner, 14.09.2011 04:23: >> i'm curious as to what can be done with (and handled better) by >> adjusting sys.setswitchinterval >> i've opened a question on SO for this, that people might find of >> interest: http://stackoverflow.com[...] > > I wonder why people ask this kind of question on stackoverflow, and > then come here asking people to go over there, read the question, and > (potentially) provide an answer. > > IMHO, c.l.py is a much better place to ask Python(-related) questions > than stackoverflow. It's also a much better place to search for an > answer that is already available in the archives. > If you want an answer to how to get a specific bit of code to work then Stackoverflow is better if only because people can see who has already answered so don't need to waste time re-answering every trivial little question about syntax. Also there's a theory that people can search for existing answers so only one person in the class has to ask how to do their homework. I've never actually asked a question on Stackoverflow but I have found the answers to a lot of problems I've had. If you want an open-ended discussion then c.l.py is the place to go. On Stackoverflow you would likely just have the question closed pdq. -- Duncan Booth http://kupuguy.blogspot.com
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
stackoverflow and c.l.py (was: GIL switch interval) Stefan Behnel <stefan_ml@behnel.de> - 2011-09-14 06:12 +0200
Re: stackoverflow and c.l.py (was: GIL switch interval) Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-09-14 15:35 +1000
Re: stackoverflow and c.l.py Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2011-09-13 23:47 -0700
Re: stackoverflow and c.l.py (was: GIL switch interval) Duncan Booth <duncan.booth@invalid.invalid> - 2011-09-14 08:24 +0000
Re: stackoverflow and c.l.py (was: GIL switch interval) Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2011-09-14 09:42 -0400
Re: stackoverflow and c.l.py (was: GIL switch interval) Duncan Booth <duncan.booth@invalid.invalid> - 2011-09-14 19:00 +0000
Re: stackoverflow and c.l.py Thomas Jollans <t@jollybox.de> - 2011-09-14 21:34 +0200
csiph-web