Re: Why do directly imported variables behave differently than those attached to imported module?

Path	csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!feeder.news-service.com!xlned.com!feeder1.xlned.com!news.netcologne.de!newsfeed-fusi2.netcologne.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From	Duncan Booth <duncan.booth@invalid.invalid>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Subject	Re: Why do directly imported variables behave differently than those attached to imported module?
Date	4 May 2011 08:44:36 GMT
Lines	23
Message-ID	<Xns9EDB630F1EB14duncanbooth@127.0.0.1> (permalink)
References	<d8d1d20e-2edd-49e5-917c-f338ef35006f@l18g2000yql.googlegroups.com> <BANLkTikT3qeeMAToUhO7GDrve5fAJ_+vFg@mail.gmail.com> <mailman.1123.1304459240.9059.python-list@python.org>
Reply-To	duncan.booth@suttoncourtenay.org.uk
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding	8bit
X-Trace	individual.net IqlReVtY5pUz9iJe0bANZwiWco1786ytwvJSuydDj1ER6OsxwG
Cancel-Lock	sha1:/rUtDcwApON4q1k4UZVnh0BZOcE=
User-Agent	Xnews/2006.08.24 Hamster/2.1.0.11
X-Face	.C;/v3#w@2k.C(.1v-}d=`\|7AQ-%,#A$0ZGtAkLPvuawAM>3#D,pXaAb31%(=Gn2ZZK/Z~fd0y4't5iKK~F":}F2\|\mQYX+BUr4ZM\|+`@o-TKzFGwsJnan{)*b~QJ-Fu^u'$$nYV
Xref	x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:4602

Show key headers only | View raw

Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> wrote:

> Here's a side point. What types will hold a reference to the enclosing
> module (or at least its dictionary)? Would it be possible to use a
> from import to load a module, then "lose" the module even though
> you're using objects from it?
> 
> I am guessing that a function or class will hold such a reference,
> because otherwise it would be a bit awkward for them to use any sort
> of module-level state. Or do they not, and instead go look for their
> module in sys.modules?

A function object has a reference to the dictionary for the module in which 
it was defined; it needs this to access global variables. A class holds the 
name of the module but has no reference to the actual module itself.

Yes, it is quite possible to delete a module object, but it won't generally 
matter since any classes that are still referenced will prevent their 
methods being deleted and any functions or methods that are still 
accessible will keep the globals alive as long as required.

-- 
Duncan Booth http://kupuguy.blogspot.com

Thread

csiph-web