Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #21105

Re: lang comparison: in-place algorithm for reversing a list in Perl,Python, Lisp

From Xah Lee <xahlee@gmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.lisp, comp.lang.python, comp.lang.perl.misc
Subject Re: lang comparison: in-place algorithm for reversing a list in Perl,Python, Lisp
Date 2012-03-01 14:04 -0800
Organization http://groups.google.com
Message-ID <8e769add-e63c-4a74-bb7e-ddd36c04a415@vs5g2000pbc.googlegroups.com> (permalink)
References <85fa5760-68c8-41a2-9116-2489165f7ca1@j5g2000yqm.googlegroups.com> <jin5fp03os@enews1.newsguy.com> <20120229231658.89@kylheku.com> <wkv4d38we76f.fsf@runa.se> <20120301064937.505@kylheku.com>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


On Mar 1, 7:04 am, Kaz Kylheku <k...@kylheku.com> wrote:
 lisp:
 (floor (/ x y)) --[rewrite]--> (floor x y)

Thanks for this interesting point.

I don't think it's a good lang design, more of a lang quirk.

similarly, in Python 2.x,
x/y
will work when both x and y are integers. Also,
x//y
works too, but that // is just perlish unreadable syntax quirk.

similarly, in perl, either one
require POSIX; floor(x/y);
the require POSIX instead of Math is a quirk. But even, floor should
really be builtin.
or
using a perl hack
int(x/y)

all of the above are quirks. They rely on computer engineering by-
products (such as int), or rely on the lang's idiosyncrasy. One easy
way to measure it is whether a programer can read and understand a
program without having to delve into its idiosyncrasies. Problem with
these lang idioms is that it's harder to understand, and whatever
advantage/optimization they provide is microscopic and temporary.

best is really floor(x/y).

idiomatic programing, is a bad thing. It was spread by perl, of
course, in the 1990s. Idiomatic lang, i.e. lang with huge number of
bizarre idioms, such as perl, is the worst.

 Xah

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

lang comparison: in-place algorithm for reversing a list in Perl, Python, Lisp Xah Lee <xahlee@gmail.com> - 2012-02-29 20:07 -0800
  Re: lang comparison: in-place algorithm for reversing a list in Perl, Python, Lisp Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-03-01 05:01 +0000
    Re: lang comparison: in-place algorithm for reversing a list in Perl, Python, Lisp Xah Lee <xahlee@gmail.com> - 2012-02-29 21:39 -0800
  Re: Re: lang comparison: in-place algorithm for reversing a list in Perl, Python, Lisp Evan Driscoll <driscoll@cs.wisc.edu> - 2012-03-01 00:07 -0600
  Re: lang comparison: in-place algorithm for reversing a list in Perl,Python, Lisp "WJ" <w_a_x_man@yahoo.com> - 2012-03-01 06:37 +0000
    Re: lang comparison: in-place algorithm for reversing a list in Perl,Python, Lisp Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mssgmbh.com> - 2012-03-01 22:14 +0000
    Re: lang comparison: in-place algorithm for reversing a list in Perl,Python, Lisp Xah Lee <xahlee@gmail.com> - 2012-03-01 14:04 -0800
      Re: lang comparison: in-place algorithm for reversing a list in Perl,Python, Lisp Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-03-02 18:11 +1100
        Re: lang comparison: in-place algorithm for reversing a list in Perl,Python, Lisp Xah Lee <xahlee@gmail.com> - 2012-03-02 03:30 -0800
  Re: lang comparison: in-place algorithm for reversing a list in Perl, Python, Lisp Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mssgmbh.com> - 2012-03-01 14:39 +0000
  Re: lang comparison: in-place algorithm for reversing a list in Perl,Python, Lisp "WJ" <w_a_x_man@yahoo.com> - 2012-03-02 07:17 +0000

csiph-web