Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #51823
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-08-02 14:15 -0700 |
| References | <mailman.93.1375386763.1251.python-list@python.org> <roy-C1BE66.20514301082013@news.panix.com> <mailman.112.1375441669.1251.python-list@python.org> <69cdc3df-475f-472c-a163-f3b85f806ff6@googlegroups.com> <mailman.129.1375456754.1251.python-list@python.org> |
| Message-ID | <8b60088c-941a-46e5-9aab-629b082ef45b@googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| Subject | Re: PEP8 revised: max line lengths |
| From | wxjmfauth@gmail.com |
Le vendredi 2 août 2013 17:19:11 UTC+2, Skip Montanaro a écrit : > > The solely valid solution, assuming there is some wish, > > > is to define a maximal line width (preferably in SI units ;-) > > > > So, 79 * 8 points == 0.222955555696 meters, right? :-) > > > > Skip You can correct your mistake yourself. In your equation, the unit at the left is [1] * [point] = [point], at the right the unit is [meter], obviously [point] != [meter]. Problem #1 For a tool which is supposed to be Unicode compliant, a Unicode compliant font has never a constant pitch, so counting a maximal width in number of characters does not make sense. Problem #2 The only valid constraint which makes sense is a maximal size in a length unit. Two possibilities: – if you consider your document is to be viewed as a screen document, pixel comes in mind. – if you condider your document will be printed, retain a physical unit length (cm, inch). Problem #3 cm or inch? The only serious unit is an SI unit. (In scientific publications, only SI units are accepted) Hint: Put you code in a pdf. jmf
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
PEP8 revised: max line lengths Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2013-08-01 15:52 -0400
Re: PEP8 revised: max line lengths Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-08-01 20:51 -0400
Re: PEP8 revised: max line lengths Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-08-02 04:28 +0000
Re: PEP8 revised: max line lengths Chris “Kwpolska” Warrick <kwpolska@gmail.com> - 2013-08-02 13:07 +0200
Re: PEP8 revised: max line lengths wxjmfauth@gmail.com - 2013-08-02 08:08 -0700
Re: PEP8 revised: max line lengths Skip Montanaro <skip@pobox.com> - 2013-08-02 10:19 -0500
Re: PEP8 revised: max line lengths wxjmfauth@gmail.com - 2013-08-02 14:15 -0700
Re: PEP8 revised: max line lengths Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-08-02 22:34 +0100
Re: PEP8 revised: max line lengths Joshua Landau <joshua@landau.ws> - 2013-08-03 03:21 +0100
Re: PEP8 revised: max line lengths Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-08-03 07:43 +0100
Re: PEP8 revised: max line lengths Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-08-03 11:00 -0400
Re: PEP8 revised: max line lengths wxjmfauth@gmail.com - 2013-08-03 10:21 -0700
Re: PEP8 revised: max line lengths Nicholas Cole <nicholas.cole@gmail.com> - 2013-08-03 12:35 +0100
Re: PEP8 revised: max line lengths wxjmfauth@gmail.com - 2013-08-04 02:52 -0700
Re: PEP8 revised: max line lengths Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-08-04 10:07 -0400
Re: PEP8 revised: max line lengths Sergi Pasoev <s.pasoev@gmail.com> - 2013-08-04 18:20 +0400
Re: PEP8 revised: max line lengths Sergi Pasoev <s.pasoev@gmail.com> - 2013-08-04 18:27 +0400
Re: PEP8 revised: max line lengths Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-08-04 15:18 +0100
Re: PEP8 revised: max line lengths Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-08-04 14:18 -0400
Re: PEP8 revised: max line lengths Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-08-04 19:23 +0100
csiph-web