Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #5540
| From | Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Subject | Re: obviscating python code for distribution |
| References | <mailman.1609.1305511928.9059.python-list@python.org> <87boz3gw5u.fsf@benfinney.id.au> <mailman.1614.1305517027.9059.python-list@python.org> <877h9rguak.fsf@benfinney.id.au> <iqra7e$l3l$1@reader1.panix.com> |
| Date | 2011-05-17 10:27 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <87y626f9x7.fsf@benfinney.id.au> (permalink) |
| Organization | Unlimited download news at news.astraweb.com |
Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> writes: > On 2011-05-16, Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> wrote: > > "Littlefield, Tyler" <tyler@tysdomain.com> writes: > > > >> I'm putting lots of work into this. I would rather not have some > >> script kiddy dig through it, yank out chunks and do whatever he > >> wants. I just want to distribute the program as-is, not distribute > >> it and leave it open to being hacked. > > > > How do these arguments apply to your code base when they don't apply > > to, say, LibreOffice or Linux or Python or Apache or Firefox? > > One obvious way that those arguments don't apply is that the OP didn't > put lots of work into LibreOffice, Linux, Python, Apache or Firefox Yet the copyright holders *did* put lots of effort into those works respectively. So the arguments would apply equally well; which is to say, they don't. > > How is your code base going to be harmed by having the source code > > available to recipients, when that demonstrably doesn't harm > > countless other code bases out there? > > The owner of something is free to determine how it is distributed -- > he doesn't have any obligation to prove to you that some particular > method of distribution is harmful to him or anybody else. Note that I didn't say anything about obligation or harm to persons. I asked only about the code base and the distribution thereof. In the meantime, Tyler has come back to us with arguments that *do* differentiate between the above cases and his own. So thanks, Tyler, for answering the questions. -- \ “Of course, everybody says they're for peace. Hitler was for | `\ peace. Everybody is for peace. The question is: what kind of | _o__) peace?” —Noam Chomsky, 1984-05-14 | Ben Finney
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
obviscating python code for distribution "Littlefield, Tyler" <tyler@tysdomain.com> - 2011-05-15 20:04 -0600
Re: obviscating python code for distribution Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2011-05-16 13:29 +1000
Re: obviscating python code for distribution "Littlefield, Tyler" <tyler@tysdomain.com> - 2011-05-15 21:36 -0600
Re: obviscating python code for distribution harrismh777 <harrismh777@charter.net> - 2011-05-15 22:48 -0500
Re: obviscating python code for distribution Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-05-16 04:03 +0000
Re: obviscating python code for distribution Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-05-16 14:40 +1000
Re: obviscating python code for distribution "Littlefield, Tyler" <tyler@tysdomain.com> - 2011-05-15 23:41 -0600
Re: obviscating python code for distribution Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-05-16 08:49 +0000
Re: obviscating python code for distribution Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-05-16 19:10 +1000
Re: obviscating python code for distribution harrismh777 <harrismh777@charter.net> - 2011-05-16 14:40 -0500
Re: obviscating python code for distribution Nobody <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2011-05-16 13:05 +0100
Re: obviscating python code for distribution James Mills <prologic@shortcircuit.net.au> - 2011-05-16 16:00 +1000
Re: obviscating python code for distribution Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-05-16 16:12 +1000
Re: obviscating python code for distribution "Littlefield, Tyler" <tyler@tysdomain.com> - 2011-05-16 00:17 -0600
Re: obviscating python code for distribution "Littlefield, Tyler" <tyler@tysdomain.com> - 2011-05-16 00:20 -0600
Re: obviscating python code for distribution Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2011-05-17 10:22 +1000
Re: obviscating python code for distribution James Mills <prologic@shortcircuit.net.au> - 2011-05-16 16:24 +1000
Re: obviscating python code for distribution geremy condra <debatem1@gmail.com> - 2011-05-16 00:27 -0700
Re: obviscating python code for distribution Jean-Michel Pichavant <jeanmichel@sequans.com> - 2011-05-16 11:36 +0200
Re: obviscating python code for distribution "Littlefield, Tyler" <tyler@tysdomain.com> - 2011-05-16 08:44 -0600
Re: obviscating python code for distribution Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2011-05-17 10:30 +1000
Re: obviscating python code for distribution alex23 <wuwei23@gmail.com> - 2011-05-16 20:45 -0700
Re: obviscating python code for distribution Dotan Cohen <dotancohen@gmail.com> - 2011-05-17 09:16 +0300
Re: obviscating python code for distribution Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-05-17 16:39 +1000
Re: obviscating python code for distribution "D'Arcy J.M. Cain" <darcy@druid.net> - 2011-05-17 09:36 -0400
Re: obviscating python code for distribution Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2011-05-16 14:10 +1000
Re: obviscating python code for distribution Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2011-05-16 13:52 +0000
Re: obviscating python code for distribution Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2011-05-17 10:27 +1000
Re: obviscating python code for distribution Disc Magnet <discmagnet@gmail.com> - 2011-05-20 14:49 +0530
csiph-web