Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #5540

Re: obviscating python code for distribution

From Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Subject Re: obviscating python code for distribution
References <mailman.1609.1305511928.9059.python-list@python.org> <87boz3gw5u.fsf@benfinney.id.au> <mailman.1614.1305517027.9059.python-list@python.org> <877h9rguak.fsf@benfinney.id.au> <iqra7e$l3l$1@reader1.panix.com>
Date 2011-05-17 10:27 +1000
Message-ID <87y626f9x7.fsf@benfinney.id.au> (permalink)
Organization Unlimited download news at news.astraweb.com

Show all headers | View raw


Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> writes:

> On 2011-05-16, Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> wrote:
> > "Littlefield, Tyler" <tyler@tysdomain.com> writes:
> >
> >> I'm putting lots of work into this. I would rather not have some
> >> script kiddy dig through it, yank out chunks and do whatever he
> >> wants. I just want to distribute the program as-is, not distribute
> >> it and leave it open to being hacked.
> >
> > How do these arguments apply to your code base when they don't apply
> > to, say, LibreOffice or Linux or Python or Apache or Firefox?
>
> One obvious way that those arguments don't apply is that the OP didn't
> put lots of work into LibreOffice, Linux, Python, Apache or Firefox

Yet the copyright holders *did* put lots of effort into those works
respectively. So the arguments would apply equally well; which is to
say, they don't.

> > How is your code base going to be harmed by having the source code
> > available to recipients, when that demonstrably doesn't harm
> > countless other code bases out there?
>
> The owner of something is free to determine how it is distributed --
> he doesn't have any obligation to prove to you that some particular
> method of distribution is harmful to him or anybody else.

Note that I didn't say anything about obligation or harm to persons. I
asked only about the code base and the distribution thereof.

In the meantime, Tyler has come back to us with arguments that *do*
differentiate between the above cases and his own. So thanks, Tyler, for
answering the questions.

-- 
 \        “Of course, everybody says they're for peace. Hitler was for |
  `\      peace. Everybody is for peace. The question is: what kind of |
_o__)                                peace?” —Noam Chomsky, 1984-05-14 |
Ben Finney

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

obviscating python code for distribution "Littlefield, Tyler" <tyler@tysdomain.com> - 2011-05-15 20:04 -0600
  Re: obviscating python code for distribution Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2011-05-16 13:29 +1000
    Re: obviscating python code for distribution "Littlefield, Tyler" <tyler@tysdomain.com> - 2011-05-15 21:36 -0600
      Re: obviscating python code for distribution harrismh777 <harrismh777@charter.net> - 2011-05-15 22:48 -0500
      Re: obviscating python code for distribution Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-05-16 04:03 +0000
        Re: obviscating python code for distribution Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-05-16 14:40 +1000
        Re: obviscating python code for distribution "Littlefield, Tyler" <tyler@tysdomain.com> - 2011-05-15 23:41 -0600
          Re: obviscating python code for distribution Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-05-16 08:49 +0000
            Re: obviscating python code for distribution Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-05-16 19:10 +1000
            Re: obviscating python code for distribution harrismh777 <harrismh777@charter.net> - 2011-05-16 14:40 -0500
          Re: obviscating python code for distribution Nobody <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2011-05-16 13:05 +0100
        Re: obviscating python code for distribution James Mills <prologic@shortcircuit.net.au> - 2011-05-16 16:00 +1000
        Re: obviscating python code for distribution Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-05-16 16:12 +1000
        Re: obviscating python code for distribution "Littlefield, Tyler" <tyler@tysdomain.com> - 2011-05-16 00:17 -0600
        Re: obviscating python code for distribution "Littlefield, Tyler" <tyler@tysdomain.com> - 2011-05-16 00:20 -0600
          Re: obviscating python code for distribution Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2011-05-17 10:22 +1000
        Re: obviscating python code for distribution James Mills <prologic@shortcircuit.net.au> - 2011-05-16 16:24 +1000
        Re: obviscating python code for distribution geremy condra <debatem1@gmail.com> - 2011-05-16 00:27 -0700
        Re: obviscating python code for distribution Jean-Michel Pichavant <jeanmichel@sequans.com> - 2011-05-16 11:36 +0200
        Re: obviscating python code for distribution "Littlefield, Tyler" <tyler@tysdomain.com> - 2011-05-16 08:44 -0600
          Re: obviscating python code for distribution Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2011-05-17 10:30 +1000
          Re: obviscating python code for distribution alex23 <wuwei23@gmail.com> - 2011-05-16 20:45 -0700
        Re: obviscating python code for distribution Dotan Cohen <dotancohen@gmail.com> - 2011-05-17 09:16 +0300
        Re: obviscating python code for distribution Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-05-17 16:39 +1000
        Re: obviscating python code for distribution "D'Arcy J.M. Cain" <darcy@druid.net> - 2011-05-17 09:36 -0400
      Re: obviscating python code for distribution Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2011-05-16 14:10 +1000
        Re: obviscating python code for distribution Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2011-05-16 13:52 +0000
          Re: obviscating python code for distribution Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2011-05-17 10:27 +1000
    Re: obviscating python code for distribution Disc Magnet <discmagnet@gmail.com> - 2011-05-20 14:49 +0530

csiph-web