Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #98062

Re: Python 2 vs Python 3 for teaching

From Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Subject Re: Python 2 vs Python 3 for teaching
Date 2015-11-01 11:47 -0800
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <87y4ehzeli.fsf@nightsong.com> (permalink)
References <CAPTjJmoPtk30rzoDOFnN5evRrd3kDtvie1E1F0Wu_DxWTsc+jA@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ4+4apy=ibu4r6d5vj707xoLYEty7MdaOtE+9oi3VOnehB+XA@mail.gmail.com> <mailman.22.1446388053.4463.python-list@python.org>

Show all headers | View raw

Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> writes:
> We teach 3.4 (because that's what's available on the Ubuntu VMs that
> we're recommending; anything 3.2+ will probably work just the same),
> and that's it.

The async keyword seems like one of Py3's bigger improvements and it
makes its appearance in 3.5, iirc.

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Python 2 vs Python 3 for teaching Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 01:27 +1100
  Re: Python 2 vs Python 3 for teaching Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-01 11:47 -0800
    Re: Python 2 vs Python 3 for teaching Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 09:03 +1100

csiph-web