Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #26707
| From | Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Subject | Re: I thought I understood how import worked... |
| References | <roy-B56619.09182407082012@news.panix.com> |
| Date | 2012-08-07 23:55 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <87txweiz7f.fsf@benfinney.id.au> (permalink) |
| Organization | Unlimited download news at news.astraweb.com |
Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> writes:
> So, it appears that you *can* import a module twice, if you refer to
> it by different names! This is surprising.
The tutorial is misleading on this. It it says plainly:
A module can contain executable statements as well as function
definitions. […] They are executed only the *first* time the module
is imported somewhere.
<URL:http://docs.python.org/tutorial/modules.html>
but it doesn't make clear that a module can exist in the ‘sys.modules’
list multiple times under different names.
Care to file a documentation bug <URL:http://bugs.python.org/>
describing this?
> It means that having non-idempotent code which is executed at import
> time is a Bad Thing.
This is true whether or not the above about module imports is true. A
well-designed module should have top level code that performs idempotent
actions.
Be thankful that you've discovered this, and apply it well :-)
--
\ “See, in my line of work you gotta keep repeating things over |
`\ and over and over again, for the truth to sink in; to kinda |
_o__) catapult the propaganda.” —George W. Bush, 2005-05 |
Ben Finney
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
I thought I understood how import worked... Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2012-08-07 09:18 -0400
Re: I thought I understood how import worked... Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-08-07 13:52 +0000
Re: I thought I understood how import worked... Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2012-08-07 08:25 -0700
Re: I thought I understood how import worked... Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-08-07 08:53 -0700
Re: I thought I understood how import worked... Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-08-07 17:54 +0000
Re: I thought I understood how import worked... Cameron Simpson <cs@zip.com.au> - 2012-08-08 08:47 +1000
Re: I thought I understood how import worked... Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2012-08-07 19:05 -0400
Re: I thought I understood how import worked... Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2012-08-08 14:14 +1000
Re: I thought I understood how import worked... Laszlo Nagy <gandalf@shopzeus.com> - 2012-08-08 08:40 +0200
Re: I thought I understood how import worked... Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2012-08-08 09:12 -0400
Re: I thought I understood how import worked... Cameron Simpson <cs@zip.com.au> - 2012-08-09 15:52 +1000
Re: I thought I understood how import worked... Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2012-08-07 23:55 +1000
Re: I thought I understood how import worked... Laszlo Nagy <gandalf@shopzeus.com> - 2012-08-07 16:14 +0200
Re: I thought I understood how import worked... Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2012-08-07 08:32 -0700
Re: I thought I understood how import worked... Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2012-08-07 13:15 -0400
Re: I thought I understood how import worked... Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-08-07 15:10 +0100
Re: I thought I understood how import worked... Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2012-08-07 12:49 -0400
Re: I thought I understood how import worked... Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-08-07 18:44 +0100
Re: I thought I understood how import worked... Jean-Michel Pichavant <jeanmichel@sequans.com> - 2012-08-08 10:47 +0200
csiph-web