Re: Multiprocessing question

From	Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Subject	Re: Multiprocessing question
Date	2014-07-14 08:07 +0300
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<87sim45xzu.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> (permalink)
References	<CA+dsdf0iwt_Z9iDoFTUu8XD6m70onQ3Gb2BoDDU_fjY9qF=gmA@mail.gmail.com> <mailman.11792.1405297006.18130.python-list@python.org>

Show all headers | View raw

Gary Herron <gary.herron@islandtraining.com>:

> On 07/13/2014 04:53 PM, Paul LaFollette wrote:
>> I have thrown together a little C/UNIX program that forks a child
>> process, then proceeds to let the child and parent alternate. Either
>> can run until it pauses itself and wakes the other.
>>
>> [...]
>
> What do you gain from using Python if you eliminate all the tools
> Python provides?

The language core itself.

Anyway, the subprocessing.Popen is perfect for process creation. For
event multiplexing, Python3.4 has the asyncio module, although
multiplexing pipes might be platform-dependent (works in linux at
least).

Marko

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Multiprocessing question Gary Herron <gary.herron@islandtraining.com> - 2014-07-13 17:07 -0700
  Re: Multiprocessing question Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-07-14 08:07 +0300

csiph-web