Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #83366
| From | Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Subject | Re: Comparisons and sorting of a numeric class.... |
| Date | 2015-01-08 21:41 +0200 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <87sifl12mp.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <54ace9f0$0$2738$c3e8da3$76491128@news.astraweb.com> <87tx02gb9d.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <54adc53c$0$12999$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <877fwx3i8f.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <mailman.17478.1420729591.18130.python-list@python.org> |
Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com>: >> An advantage of the Scheme way is the chaining of "and" and "or". For >> example, this breaks in Python: >> >> def dir_contents(path): >> if os.path.isdir(path): >> return os.listdir(path) >> return None >> >> def get_choices(): >> return dir_contents(PRIMARY) or \ >> dir_contents(SECONDARY) or \ >> [ BUILTIN_PATH ] > > That depends on what the function is intended to do in the first > place. Why would you want to return the contents of an empty directory > rather than the default? To demonstrate the principle. Such short-circuited expressions have spread to numerous high-level programming languages. Python has them, too, but you have to be extra careful not to be hit by the surprising false interpretations. > Anyway, to make that work as you want it in Scheme, dir_contents would > have to return #f, not None. Does it really make sense for a > non-predicate function to be returning the value "false"? By custom, #f acts as the de-facto None of Scheme for that very reason. In classic Lisp, nil takes the roles of None, False and [], leading to the confusion I mentioned. Of course, Scheme now has to deal with distinguishing None (#f) and False (#f as well). Luckily, that confusion rarely comes to play. Marko
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Comparisons and sorting of a numeric class.... Andrew Robinson <andrew3@r3dsolutions.com> - 2015-01-06 18:01 -0800
Re: Comparisons and sorting of a numeric class.... Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2015-01-07 08:10 +0000
Re: Comparisons and sorting of a numeric class.... Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-01-07 19:21 +1100
Re: Comparisons and sorting of a numeric class.... Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2015-01-07 12:01 +0200
Re: Comparisons and sorting of a numeric class.... Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2015-01-08 10:46 +1100
Re: Comparisons and sorting of a numeric class.... Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2015-01-08 08:21 +0200
Re: Comparisons and sorting of a numeric class.... Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2015-01-08 07:57 -0700
Re: Comparisons and sorting of a numeric class.... Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2015-01-08 21:41 +0200
Re: Comparisons and sorting of a numeric class.... Chris Kaynor <ckaynor@zindagigames.com> - 2015-01-08 10:44 -0800
Re: Comparisons and sorting of a numeric class.... Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2015-01-09 23:27 +1100
Re: Comparisons and sorting of a numeric class.... Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-01-09 23:43 +1100
Re: Comparisons and sorting of a numeric class.... Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2015-01-09 16:28 +0200
Re: Comparisons and sorting of a numeric class.... Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2015-01-09 07:06 -0800
Re: Comparisons and sorting of a numeric class.... Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-01-10 02:14 +1100
Re: Comparisons and sorting of a numeric class.... Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2015-01-09 17:16 +0200
csiph-web