Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #91678
| Path | csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!1.eu.feeder.erje.net!news.swapon.de!news.panservice.it!feed.xsnews.nl!border02.ams.xsnews.nl!feeder04.ams.xsnews.nl!abp001.ams.xsnews.nl!frontend-F10-17.ams.news.kpn.nl |
|---|---|
| From | Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Subject | Re: Best way to prevent zombie processes |
| Organization | Decebal Computing |
| References | <87vbf8l9e7.fsf@Equus.decebal.nl> <871thvlj3e.fsf@Equus.decebal.nl> <8761778sgz.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> |
| X-Face | "(y8cC@tg_12{">GF'UXTW]FHI2wMiZNrnf'1EFQ&O#$m:f#O7+7}kR<J%a^F2lh4[N~Yz4 nSp#c+aQo1b5=?HcNEkQ7QzF<])O3X4MDL/AYjys&*mt>,v+Pti8=Vi/Z"g^?b"E |
| X-Homepage | http://www.decebal.nl/ |
| Date | Mon, 01 Jun 2015 16:37:07 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <87siabjy0c.fsf@Equus.decebal.nl> (permalink) |
| User-Agent | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:iWeq8XGqODmiJNb998X9X56Nbw0= |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain |
| Lines | 21 |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 81.207.62.244 |
| X-Trace | 1433169956 news.kpn.nl 20796 81.207.62.244@kpn/81.207.62.244:37364 |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.python:91678 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Op Monday 1 Jun 2015 15:32 CEST schreef Marko Rauhamaa: > Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl>: > >> Thread(target = p.wait).start() >> >> [...] >> >> How about this way of solving it? > > It works. That I knew: I tested it before I posted it. What I mend is this better, worse, or the same as working with signal. In my eye it is much better, but maybe there is a reason that would make my line of thinking wrong. -- Cecil Westerhof Senior Software Engineer LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Best way to prevent zombie processes Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-05-31 23:33 +0200
Re: Best way to prevent zombie processes Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2015-06-01 01:22 +0300
Re: Best way to prevent zombie processes Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-06-01 11:20 +0200
Re: Best way to prevent zombie processes Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-06-01 20:04 +1000
Re: Best way to prevent zombie processes Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2015-06-01 13:21 +0300
Re: Best way to prevent zombie processes Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2015-06-01 13:25 +0300
Re: Best way to prevent zombie processes Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-06-01 14:59 +0000
Re: Best way to prevent zombie processes Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2015-06-01 18:39 +0300
Re: Best way to prevent zombie processes Cameron Simpson <cs@zip.com.au> - 2015-06-01 11:03 +1000
Re: Best way to prevent zombie processes Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-06-01 11:23 +0200
Re: Best way to prevent zombie processes Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2015-06-01 13:37 +1000
Re: Best way to prevent zombie processes Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-06-01 14:16 +0200
Re: Best way to prevent zombie processes Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2015-06-01 16:32 +0300
Re: Best way to prevent zombie processes Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-06-01 16:37 +0200
Re: Best way to prevent zombie processes Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-06-01 15:03 +0200
csiph-web