Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #93612
| From | Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Subject | Re: module dependencies issues |
| Date | 2015-07-10 00:33 +0300 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <87k2u96mo3.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <mailman.370.1436472009.3674.python-list@python.org> <87wpy96pbd.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <mailman.372.1436474856.3674.python-list@python.org> <87oajl6nol.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <mailman.373.1436476819.3674.python-list@python.org> |
Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com>: > On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 7:11 AM, Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> wrote: >> Whoever creates B-1.1 ought to make it backward-compatible, but he >> should also say so. The majority of developers are careless about >> backward-compatibility; having the component system make wishful >> assumptions will lead to catastrophic consequences. > > I strongly disagree. All your idea would do is create a massive > compatibility matrix, which would itself become utterly > unmaintainable. Well, it's working and very much maintainable. > It's all very well to ask for a declaration that 1.1 is compatible > with 1.0, but what happens when you add in 1.2 and 1.3, and then add > some point releases on all of them? The compatibility statement accepts ranges and can be open-ended. > And just how compatible does it have to be to get a tick? It must be a safe binary replacement of the earlier version. Bug fixes and new features are ok, but none of the old functionality can be obsoleted. Marko
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: module dependencies issues Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-07-10 05:59 +1000
Re: module dependencies issues Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2015-07-09 23:36 +0300
Re: module dependencies issues Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-07-10 06:47 +1000
Re: module dependencies issues Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2015-07-10 00:11 +0300
Re: module dependencies issues Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-07-10 07:20 +1000
Re: module dependencies issues Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2015-07-10 00:33 +0300
Re: module dependencies issues Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-07-10 07:45 +1000
Re: module dependencies issues Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2015-07-10 03:04 +0300
Re: module dependencies issues Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-07-10 01:24 +0100
csiph-web