Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #45663
| From | Paul Rudin <paul.nospam@rudin.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Subject | Re: sympy.nsimplify |
| Date | 2013-05-21 12:17 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <87hahweg57.fsf@no-fixed-abode.cable.virginmedia.net> (permalink) |
| References | <519b2fa6$0$6574$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <CAPTjJmrJFy-UmqO5m5zALA0MRRvsCBvAPJnPR2AQ8cxT9jT23A@mail.gmail.com> <mailman.1920.1369134110.3114.python-list@python.org> |
Skip Montanaro <skip@pobox.com> writes: > Very cool indeed. In the comments was a link to an XKCD cartoon. Its > tool tip mentioned "twin primes". Looked that up. Google pointed (of > course) at Wikipedia. Read that. Backed up to the Google Search, and > noticed there is a news item from 15 hours ago that an unknown > mathematician at the University of New Hampshire has proven the twin > primes conjecture: > http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2013/05/twin-primes/ > > This is nothing to do with the original post. It's just amazing to me > how short the distance between one very interesting topic on the net > and something almost unrelated can be. AIUI the twin primes conjecture hasn't been proved. But a significant related fact - that there's an infinitude of primes no more that N apart where N <~ 70,000,000. That might not sound like a lot of progress - but the point is that the existence of some finite bound is very significant.
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
sympy.nsimplify Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-05-21 08:26 +0000
Re: sympy.nsimplify Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-05-21 19:08 +1000
Re: sympy.nsimplify Skip Montanaro <skip@pobox.com> - 2013-05-21 06:01 -0500
Re: sympy.nsimplify Paul Rudin <paul.nospam@rudin.co.uk> - 2013-05-21 12:17 +0100
csiph-web