Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #89547
| Path | csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!1.eu.feeder.erje.net!news2.arglkargh.de!newsfeed.fsmpi.rwth-aachen.de!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!newsfeed.pionier.net.pl!feed.xsnews.nl!border03.ams.xsnews.nl!feeder04.ams.xsnews.nl!abp001.ams.xsnews.nl!frontend-F10-11.ams.news.kpn.nl |
|---|---|
| From | Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Subject | Re: Using + with strings considered bad |
| Organization | Decebal Computing |
| References | <878udbxrpg.fsf@Equus.decebal.nl> <mailman.79.1430299516.3680.python-list@python.org> |
| X-Face | "(y8cC@tg_12{">GF'UXTW]FHI2wMiZNrnf'1EFQ&O#$m:f#O7+7}kR<J%a^F2lh4[N~Yz4 nSp#c+aQo1b5=?HcNEkQ7QzF<])O3X4MDL/AYjys&*mt>,v+Pti8=Vi/Z"g^?b"E |
| X-Homepage | http://www.decebal.nl/ |
| Date | Wed, 29 Apr 2015 14:23:36 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <87egn3ced3.fsf@Equus.decebal.nl> (permalink) |
| User-Agent | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:k6fSFEBK++JmoyjWjgavcvL5x+Y= |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain |
| Lines | 26 |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 81.207.62.244 |
| X-Trace | 1430311489 news.kpn.nl 20626 81.207.62.244@kpn/81.207.62.244:42687 |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.python:89547 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Op Wednesday 29 Apr 2015 11:24 CEST schreef Peter Otten:
>> print('Calculating fibonacci and fibonacci_memoize once for ' +
>> str(large_fibonacci) + ' to determine speed increase')
>
> You could write that as
>
> print('Calculating fibonacci and fibonacci_memoize once for '
> '{} to determine speed increase'.format(large_fibonacci))
>
> but in a simple case like yours I'd go with the obvious
>
> print(
> 'Calculating fibonacci and fibonacci_memoize once for',
> large_fibonacci,
> 'to determine speed increase')
In 2.7 that gives:
('Calculating fibonacci and fibonacci_memoize once for', 40, 'to determine speed increase')
So I am going to use the one above it.
--
Cecil Westerhof
Senior Software Engineer
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Using + with strings considered bad Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-04-29 10:29 +0200
Re: Using + with strings considered bad Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-04-29 10:08 +0100
Re: Using + with strings considered bad Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2015-04-29 11:24 +0200
Re: Using + with strings considered bad Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-04-29 13:17 +0200
Re: Using + with strings considered bad Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-04-29 14:23 +0200
Re: Using + with strings considered bad Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-04-29 22:55 +1000
Re: Using + with strings considered bad Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2015-04-29 23:15 +1000
Re: Using + with strings considered bad wxjmfauth@gmail.com - 2015-04-29 08:16 -0700
Re: Using + with strings considered bad Andrew Berg <aberg010@my.hennepintech.edu> - 2015-04-29 06:40 -0500
csiph-web