Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #94088
| From | Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Subject | Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? |
| Date | 2015-07-18 20:45 -0700 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <87egk4zu6m.fsf@jester.gateway.sonic.net> (permalink) |
| References | <moenuj$f11$1@ger.gmane.org> <moeqtn$mh0$1@ger.gmane.org> <mailman.693.1437269689.3674.python-list@python.org> |
Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> writes: > I am suggesting that if there are 10x as many 2.7only programmers as > 3.xonly programmers, and none of the 2.7 programmers is willing to do > the backport *of an already accepted patch*, then maybe it should not > be done at all. The patch acceptance/approval process is frankly daunting.
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2015-07-18 21:34 -0400
Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2015-07-18 20:45 -0700
Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2015-07-18 21:04 -0700
Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-07-19 14:52 +0100
csiph-web