Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #89663
| Path | csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!1.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!news.panservice.it!feed.xsnews.nl!border02.ams.xsnews.nl!feeder04.ams.xsnews.nl!feeder02.ams.xsnews.nl!abp002.ams.xsnews.nl!frontend-F09-04.ams.news.kpn.nl |
|---|---|
| From | Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Subject | Re: Is my implementation of happy number OK |
| Organization | Decebal Computing |
| References | <87oam5vc8k.fsf@Equus.decebal.nl> <mailman.137.1430415473.3680.python-list@python.org> |
| X-Face | "(y8cC@tg_12{">GF'UXTW]FHI2wMiZNrnf'1EFQ&O#$m:f#O7+7}kR<J%a^F2lh4[N~Yz4 nSp#c+aQo1b5=?HcNEkQ7QzF<])O3X4MDL/AYjys&*mt>,v+Pti8=Vi/Z"g^?b"E |
| X-Homepage | http://www.decebal.nl/ |
| Date | Thu, 30 Apr 2015 21:05:59 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <87bni5tp0o.fsf@Equus.decebal.nl> (permalink) |
| User-Agent | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:nXXBIhatWf9TiH/eWppZnSeOII0= |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain |
| Lines | 22 |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 81.207.62.244 |
| X-Trace | 1430422131 news.kpn.nl 19259 81.207.62.244@kpn/81.207.62.244:40469 |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.python:89663 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Op Thursday 30 Apr 2015 19:37 CEST schreef Ian Kelly:
Most I still have to digest. ;-)
> On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 9:59 AM, Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> wrote:
>> return (current_array, ''.join(current_array))
>
> You don't seem to be actually using current_array for anything, so
> why not just return the string?
My implementation was not finished. I had intended to make it:
current_array, \
current_string = create_current(sum([value ** 2
for value in current_array]))
But it does not make it significantly faster, so yes, I am going to
return only the string.
--
Cecil Westerhof
Senior Software Engineer
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Is my implementation of happy number OK Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-04-30 17:59 +0200
Re: Is my implementation of happy number OK Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.co.uk> - 2015-04-30 17:04 +0000
Re: Is my implementation of happy number OK Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2015-04-30 11:37 -0600
Re: Is my implementation of happy number OK Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-04-30 21:05 +0200
Re: Is my implementation of happy number OK Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> - 2015-04-30 14:53 -0400
Re: Is my implementation of happy number OK Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-04-30 22:35 +0200
Re: Is my implementation of happy number OK Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> - 2015-04-30 17:31 -0400
Re: Is my implementation of happy number OK Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.co.uk> - 2015-04-30 23:31 +0000
Re: Is my implementation of happy number OK Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> - 2015-04-30 19:52 -0400
Re: Is my implementation of happy number OK Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-05-01 06:36 +0200
Re: Is my implementation of happy number OK Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.co.uk> - 2015-05-01 07:23 +0000
Re: Is my implementation of happy number OK Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2015-05-01 18:27 +1000
Re: Is my implementation of happy number OK Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2015-05-01 09:03 -0600
Re: Is my implementation of happy number OK Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2015-05-01 20:13 +0200
Re: Is my implementation of happy number OK Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.co.uk> - 2015-05-02 21:23 +0000
csiph-web