Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #96912
| From | Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Subject | Re: Lightwight socket IO wrapper |
| Date | 2015-09-21 07:39 +0300 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <876134e683.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> (permalink) |
| References | <CAPTjJmpLyuy==kY4hj11pGkRedhBS5vevitmzeDvwz8rQpSSag@mail.gmail.com> <20150921015514.GA70236@cskk.homeip.net> <mailman.17.1442803211.28679.python-list@python.org> |
Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com>: > On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 11:55 AM, Cameron Simpson <cs@zip.com.au> wrote: >> Another nice thing about TCP is that wil a little effort you get to >> pack multiple data packets (or partial data packets) into a network >> packet, etc. > > Emphatically - a little effort sometimes, and other times no effort at > all! If you write a packet of data, then write another one, and > another, and another, and another, without waiting for responses, > Nagling should combine them automatically. And even if they're not > deliberately queued by Nagle's Algorithm, packets can get combined for > other reasons. So, yeah! Definitely can help a lot with packet counts > on small writes. Unfortunately, Nagle and delayed ACK, which are both defaults, don't go well together (you get nasty 200-millisecond hickups). I recommend using socket.TCP_CORK with socket.TCP_NODELAY where they are available (Linux). They give you Nagle without delayed ACK. See <URL: http://linux.die.net/man/7/tcp> As for the topic, TCP doesn't need wrappers to abstract away the difficult bits. That's a superficially good idea that leads to trouble. Marko
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Lightwight socket IO wrapper Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-09-21 12:40 +1000
Re: Lightwight socket IO wrapper Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2015-09-21 07:39 +0300
Re: Lightwight socket IO wrapper Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-09-21 14:48 +1000
Re: Lightwight socket IO wrapper Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2015-09-21 09:56 +0300
Re: Lightwight socket IO wrapper Michael Ströder <michael@stroeder.com> - 2015-09-21 09:02 +0200
Re: Lightwight socket IO wrapper Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2015-09-21 10:57 +0300
Re: Lightwight socket IO wrapper Michael Ströder <michael@stroeder.com> - 2015-09-21 10:29 +0200
Re: Lightwight socket IO wrapper Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2015-09-21 11:47 +0300
Re: Lightwight socket IO wrapper MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2015-09-21 13:26 +0100
csiph-web