Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #49606
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-07-01 21:16 -0700 |
| References | (1 earlier) <b3dcp4Fhl04U2@mid.individual.net> <CAPTjJmpvPPkM8sDaDu_jwXW1kHvhfrbN4niWeE3b_mX5SeSkyA@mail.gmail.com> <CAN1F8qUkstvGHdxRN0at-z3_5iXi4XKY36Xmnf-fnsFuPY+mAg@mail.gmail.com> <mailman.4082.1372707405.3114.python-list@python.org> <51d1fe0d$0$29973$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> |
| Message-ID | <875111a8-4784-4590-aecd-3c505e26126b@googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| Subject | Re: Stupid ways to spell simple code |
| From | 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@gmail.com> |
Steven D'Aprano於 2013年7月2日星期二UTC+8上午6時09分18秒寫道: > On Mon, 01 Jul 2013 20:36:29 +0100, Marcin Szamotulski wrote: > > > > > Here is another example which I came across when playing with > > > generators, the first function is actually quite useful, the second > > > generator is the whole fun: > > > > > > from functools import wraps > > > def init(func): > > > """decorator which initialises the generator """ > > > @wraps(func) > > > def inner(*args, **kwargs): > > > g = func(*args, **kwargs) > > > g.send(None) > > > return g > > > return inner > > > > > > @init > > > def gen(func): > > > x = (yield) > > > while True: > > > x = (yield func(x)) > > > > > > > > > now if you have function f > > > def f(arg): > > > return arg**2 > > > > > > then calling f(5) is the same as > > > > > > g = gen(f) > > > g.send(5) > > > > > > > > I think you must be missing an important part of the trick, because > > calling f(5) returns 25. It's not: > > > > @gen > > def f(arg): > > return arg**2 > > > > > > because that raises TypeError. > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Steven Lets be serious about generators and iterators. A generator can be used only once in a program is different from a a generator method of a class that can produce several instances with generators of the same kind but operated in each instance of the class.
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Stupid ways to spell simple code Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-06-30 16:06 +1000
Re: Stupid ways to spell simple code Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-06-30 07:58 -0700
Re: Stupid ways to spell simple code Joshua Landau <joshua.landau.ws@gmail.com> - 2013-06-30 16:08 +0100
Re: Stupid ways to spell simple code Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-07-01 01:20 +1000
Re: Stupid ways to spell simple code Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2013-06-30 11:26 -0600
Re: Stupid ways to spell simple code Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-06-30 17:36 +0000
Re: Stupid ways to spell simple code Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-06-30 13:44 -0400
Re: Stupid ways to spell simple code Joshua Landau <joshua.landau.ws@gmail.com> - 2013-06-30 22:52 +0100
Re: Stupid ways to spell simple code Neil Cerutti <neilc@norwich.edu> - 2013-07-01 12:59 +0000
Re: Stupid ways to spell simple code Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-07-01 23:14 +1000
Re: Stupid ways to spell simple code Joshua Landau <joshua.landau.ws@gmail.com> - 2013-07-01 17:30 +0100
Re: Stupid ways to spell simple code Marcin Szamotulski <mszamot@gmail.com> - 2013-07-01 20:36 +0100
Re: Stupid ways to spell simple code Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-07-01 22:09 +0000
Re: Stupid ways to spell simple code 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@gmail.com> - 2013-07-01 21:16 -0700
Re: Stupid ways to spell simple code Marcin Szamotulski <mszamot@gmail.com> - 2013-07-02 07:22 +0100
Re: Stupid ways to spell simple code Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-07-02 02:32 +1000
Re: Stupid ways to spell simple code Russel Walker <russ.pobox@gmail.com> - 2013-07-02 00:33 -0700
csiph-web