Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #89590
| From | Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Subject | Re: Lucky numbers in Python |
| Organization | Decebal Computing |
| References | <87lhhabxod.fsf@Equus.decebal.nl> <mailman.95.1430337506.3680.python-list@python.org> <87d22mbod7.fsf@Equus.decebal.nl> <mailman.103.1430347166.3680.python-list@python.org> |
| Date | 2015-04-30 02:01 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <871tj2bi2p.fsf@Equus.decebal.nl> (permalink) |
Op Thursday 30 Apr 2015 00:38 CEST schreef Ian Kelly: > On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 3:45 PM, Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> wrote: >> Op Wednesday 29 Apr 2015 21:57 CEST schreef Ian Kelly: >>> And although it's not clear to me what this is supposed to be >>> doing, you probably no longer need the middle term if the >>> intention is to continue deleting all the way to the end of the >>> list (if it is then I think you have a bug in the existing >>> implementation, since the last item in the list can never be >>> deleted). >> >> What do you mean by this? Executing: >> lucky_numbers(5) >> gives: >> [1, 3] >> >> So the last element (5) is deleted. > > Off by one error on my part. This is why negative skip values on > ranges and slices are not recommended: they're confusing. :-) > > In that case you can definitely omit the middle term of the slice, > which will be both more concise and clearer in intent, though > probably not significantly faster. It is certainly nit faster. It is even significantly slower. With the middle term lucky_numbers(int(1e6)) takes 0.13 seconds. Without it takes 14.3 seconds. Hundred times as long. -- Cecil Westerhof Senior Software Engineer LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Lucky numbers in Python Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-04-29 20:24 +0200
Re: Lucky numbers in Python Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2015-04-29 13:57 -0600
Re: Lucky numbers in Python Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-04-29 23:45 +0200
Re: Lucky numbers in Python Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2015-04-29 16:38 -0600
Re: Lucky numbers in Python Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-04-30 02:01 +0200
Re: Lucky numbers in Python Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2015-04-29 20:55 -0600
Re: Lucky numbers in Python Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-04-30 08:34 +0200
Re: Lucky numbers in Python Chris Kaynor <ckaynor@zindagigames.com> - 2015-04-29 15:56 -0700
Re: Lucky numbers in Python Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2015-04-30 10:11 +1000
Re: Lucky numbers in Python Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2015-04-29 21:08 -0600
Re: Lucky numbers in Python Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-04-30 20:55 +0200
Re: Lucky numbers in Python Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> - 2015-04-30 15:28 -0400
csiph-web