Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #26934
| From | Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Subject | Re: Arithmetic with Boolean values |
| References | <58f60e60-1dc1-4265-a601-693d11b4bcec@googlegroups.com> |
| Date | 2012-08-11 17:54 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <7x4no96ib3.fsf@ruckus.brouhaha.com> (permalink) |
| Organization | Nightsong/Fort GNOX |
John Ladasky <john_ladasky@sbcglobal.net> writes: > I have gotten used to switching back and forth between Boolean algebra > and numerical values. Python generally makes this quite easy. Generally ugly though, at least to my tastes. "Explicit is better than implicit" as the saying goes. > If the length of the list L is odd, I want to process it once. If > len(L) is even, I want to process it twice.... > for x in range(1 + not(len(L) % 2)): If you really have to do something like that, I'd say for x in range(1 + (len(L) & 1)): or for x in range(2 - len(L) % 2): are simpler and avoid those bogus bool conversions. I'd prefer to just say the intention: for x in range(1 if len(L)%2==1 else 2): > This provoked a SyntaxError. "not" is a syntactic keyword and "1 + not" is syntactically invalid. You could write "1 + (not ...)" as you discovered, but really, it's hackish.
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Arithmetic with Boolean values John Ladasky <john_ladasky@sbcglobal.net> - 2012-08-11 15:30 -0700
Re: Arithmetic with Boolean values Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-08-12 09:13 +1000
Re: Arithmetic with Boolean values Chris Rebert <clp2@rebertia.com> - 2012-08-11 16:53 -0700
Re: Arithmetic with Boolean values Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2012-08-11 20:25 -0400
Re: Arithmetic with Boolean values Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-08-12 10:31 +1000
Re: Arithmetic with Boolean values MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2012-08-12 01:36 +0100
Re: Arithmetic with Boolean values Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-08-11 17:54 -0700
Re: Arithmetic with Boolean values Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-08-12 11:22 +0000
Re: Arithmetic with Boolean values Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2012-08-12 07:40 -0400
Re: Arithmetic with Boolean values Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-08-12 14:06 +0000
Re: Arithmetic with Boolean values Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-08-12 09:59 -0700
Re: Arithmetic with Boolean values Bernd Nawothnig <Bernd.Nawothnig@t-online.de> - 2012-08-12 19:21 +0200
Re: Arithmetic with Boolean values Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-08-12 19:20 +0100
Re: Arithmetic with Boolean values Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2012-08-12 14:45 -0400
Re: Arithmetic with Boolean values Alister <alister.ware@ntlworld.com> - 2012-08-12 20:13 +0000
Re: Arithmetic with Boolean values Gene Heskett <gheskett@wdtv.com> - 2012-08-12 20:29 -0400
Re: Arithmetic with Boolean values Hans Mulder <hansmu@xs4all.nl> - 2012-08-14 18:32 +0200
csiph-web